by Doctor Science
Last month there was quite a uproar in the sf/fantasy realm over Orson Scott Card’s novella Hamlet’s Father, a re-working of Hamlet in which Hamlet’s father turns out to have been a gay child molester. Rose Fox at Publisher’s Weekly has a good summary of the firestorm; as she says,
But this is the thing about offensiveness grenades: they may look entirely inert for so long that you forget they’re dangerous, but sooner or later, they explode.
One reason for the uproar is that OSC (as he’s often known) is outspokenly anti-homosexual — yonmei’s posts on Dissecting Orson Scott Card go into all the detail you can stomach.
“Hamlet’s Father” was originally published in The Ghost Quartet, four sf/horror novellas edited by Marvin Kaye, so I got it out of the library and read it to judge for myself. What I found was that the people objecting to the story (who actually read it, that is) were mostly IMHO reading it wrong. This is not surprising, because IMHO OSC *wrote* it wrong.
William Alexander at Rain Taxi is wrong when he describes the “punch line” as:
“Old King Hamlet was an inadequate king because he was gay, an evil person because he was gay, and, ultimately, a demonic and ghostly father of lies who convinces young Hamlet to exact imaginary revenge on innocent people.
And Publisher’s Weekly is wrong to say:
the focus is primarily on linking homosexuality with the life-destroying horrors of pedophilia
I disagree. The story is not in any developed way about homosexuality, it is about child abuse. In that respect, it’s very much like the rest of OSC’s fiction, which focuses on the figure of an abused child with a consistency I can only call compulsive.
So (IMHO, IMHO, it’s all just A Theory Which Is Mine) OSC wrote it wrong because he’s unable to look clearly at the pictures he himself paints. A basic rule of fiction writing is “Show, Don’t Tell” — and what OSC *shows* is the traditional, patriarchal family as a nightmare of abuse, while what he *tells* is that these are the only “real families” worthy of respect.
I am cutting here for:
TRIGGER WARNING: discussion of fictional and real-life child abuse, emotional and sexual. Survivors take care.
SPOILER WARNING: post and comments may contain spoilers for any work by Orson Scott Card.
PSYCHOBIOGRAPHY WARNING: includes analysis and speculation about the psychological makeup of a living person, verging on Real Person Fic. May contain trace Freudian concepts.
Read more