In the previous entry I pointed out how many pro-life advocates muddy the waters of the abortion debate, and gave advice about how to avoid doing that. Since I am pro-life myself, I won’t be so rude as to give advice to the pro-choice side about how they should argue. That won’t stop me from identifying how some of them poison the well of the debate. If some pro-choice advocates want to use that to steer their compatriots to a more civil debate, I’m not opposed. The polling data on abortion reflects a large amount of unease on the part of the US public. You may believe that the best way to deal with that unease is to use the techniques which I outline below. I suspect (or maybe hope) that such tactics will eventually alienate some voters in the middle, which may cause a sudden shift in abortion politics at some point in the future. If that is true, it may be to your advantage to manage such perceptions so that you have some control over the shift.
Hey, does anybody know anything about these guys?
Bull Moose Republicans, that is: I like the notion of a more immigration-friendly GOP, but it never hurts to doublecheck a particular subgroup. They could be a front for selling magazines, or something.