Rick Heller of Centerfield is linking to a John Fund article regarding the possibility of California becoming an open primary state. Short version: Fund is profoundly leery of any voting system that could easily reproduce results like the 1991 Louisiana Senate or the 2002 French presidential races. It’s hard to blame him, although I would note that in both cases the electorate did not end up electing the lunatic. Still, Rick wants to give it a shot, seeing as he’s even less worried about kooks getting elected and he’s tired of not having enough centrists* in office.
I’d be much happier with gerrymander-proof Congressional districts, but that’s just me. At any rate, I doubt that this will make it past the courts. Granted, Louisiana’s did, butthen Louisiana doesn’t have 55 Electoral votes. I know that this is cynical of me, but honestly, the existing political parties in CA are happy enough with the status quo – they ought to be; they designed it that way – and thus not in the mood to rock boats. I also believe that this proposal would make Californian elections a bit more complicated, yes? I seem to recall hearing people complain about that sort of thing already, although I could be misremembering…
Moe