Necessary Security?

(Crossposted to Redstate) Rivka of Respectful of Otters* has resumed blogging with an interesting post about security procedures and their actual utility, starting with this parable and following with this observation: Bruce’s point is that, while every security measure is implemented for a good reason, the good reason involved often has nothing to do with … Read more

Report: Allawi in Shooting Scandal

Well, you know Allawi is being taken seriously as the Prime Minister of Iraq now. He has his first scandal to contend with. I don’t mean to make light of this. If it’s true, he’s what I predicted would follow in Hussein’s footsteps: another authoritarian monster. He’s denying it at this point, though, so I’m … Read more

Quick and Funny

About to begin a series of mindnumbing meetings, but found this bit (via DailyKos) and choked on my ice coffee laughing. Especially liked the line “We might have to disrupt the democratic process because terrorists want to disrupt the democratic process.”

al Qaeda’s Worst Nightmare

A “mountain of evidence.” That’s what Attorney General John Ashcroft offered Congress on Tuesday, a “mountain of evidence” that the PATRIOT ACT has been instrumental in disrupting al Qaeda cells’ activities in the United States.

“The Patriot Act is al-Qaida’s worst nightmare when it comes to disrupting and disabling their operations here in America,” he said.

Makes you kind of reassess your opinion on the PATRIOT ACT doesn’t it? I mean, a whole mountain of evidence must represent a lot, right? I’d assume a lot more than some flimsy 29-page report of evidence with barely 2 dozen examples, none of which address the strongest criticisms of the PATRIOT ACT, right? A mountain of evidence would be indisputably convincing that congress should not let it expire in 2005, right?

The report did not mention some more controversial powers, such as the FBI’s ability to obtain library and bookstore records in terrorism cases or the so-called “sneak and peek” search warrants in which agents need not immediately tell suspects their home or business had been searched.

Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, ranking Democrat on the Judiciary Committee, accused the department of selectively releasing information and refusing to address civil liberties concerns.

“Coupled with the department’s consistent record of exaggerating their record about terrorism, this entire report is suspect,” Conyers said.

OK, so Conyers is a Democrat, so his opinion is automatically suspect. Besides, clearly within a mountain of evidence, the need to continue the controversial Section 215 of the law could be demonstrated, right?

Read more

Failures of Imagination

(Editor’s Note: this was written by Katherine R, and for reasons that will shortly become obvious I’m rather sadly posting it on her behalf. I hope that I got the formatting right, and…. well, read.)

Author’s Note: This is actually by Katherine, and it will be my last post here. I’ve threatened (promised?) that before, I know, but this time I’m certain of it. No cosmic reasons–just a lack of time, a lot of things to do, a feeling that I’ve said what I have to say and have started to repeat myself, and the fact that the floppy where I stored my typepad password broke a week and a half ago. I chose to interpret that last one as a sign, so instead of asking Moe if I could set up a new account, I asked him to put up one final post for me.

Since I started writing here, I’ve focused more and more on one topic: U.S. human rights abuses towards people we suspect of terrorism. I thought I might close by explaining, on a more personal level than I have before, why this is.

It’s very long, probably too long, but I hope you’ll find it worth reading.

Thanks to all readers, commenters, linkers, and especially co-bloggers. This has been fun, and actually pretty useful in sorting out what I want to do with my career. (Whether I can actually do it is another question, but this is a start.)

(Another Editor’s Note: …and she’ll always have a place for her waiting here.)

Read more

Salvation Movement

Good and Bad News as usual from Iraq.

Most promising (in a wierd way) is the emergence of the Salvation Movement, which threatens to kill Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi if he doesn’t leave Iraq.

A group of armed, masked Iraqi men threatened Tuesday to kill Jordanian militant Abu Musab al-Zarqawi if he did not immediately leave the country, accusing him of murdering innocent Iraqis and defiling the Muslim religion.

The threats revealed the deep anger many Iraqis, including insurgent groups, feel toward foreign fighters, whom many consider as illegitimate a presence here as the 160,000 U.S. and other coalition troops.

In a videotape sent to the al-Arabiya television station, a group calling itself the “Salvation Movement,” questioned how al-Zarqawi could use Islam to justify the killing of innocent civilians, the targeting of government officials and the kidnapping and beheading of foreigners.

“He must leave Iraq immediately, he and his followers and everyone who gives shelter to him and his criminal actions,” said a man on the video.

Read more

A retraction?

Yesterday it was reported that Cpl. Wassef Ali Hassoun had been murdered by radical terrorists; today, there was a retraction. AGHDAD, Iraq – An Iraqi guerrilla group denied on Sunday that it put out a statement a day earlier claiming to have beheaded kidnapped Cpl. Wassef Ali Hassoun, leaving the fate of the U.S. Marine … Read more

Innocent Until Proven Guilty?

The Saddam Hussein Defense team just got a whole lot stranger:

The daughter of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, the Libyan president, will help defend Saddam Hussein in court, a Jordanian lawyer and member of Mr. Hussein’s legal team said Friday.

Aicha Muammar el-Qaddafi, a law professor in her late 20’s, will become part of a Jordanian-based multinational defense team, the lawyer, Ziad al-Khasawneh, said Thursday.

A statement issued Thursday by a charity association led by Ms. Qaddafi said she wanted to guarantee that Mr. Hussein received a fair trial based on “the principle that all accused should be presumed innocent until proven guilty.”

Which got me to wondering something I’m sure our good friends with JD’s can shed some light on. If the Iraqi courts and Iraqi judges indicting Hussein are seen as legitimate enough to try Hussein (as opposed to trying him at The Hague, a la Milosevic), wouldn’t that require a presupposition that the new government is legitimate because Hussein was disposed of legitimately. In other words, Hussein was already presumed guilty.*

Read more

Fafnir Friday: jury duty

OK, so you really should read Fafnir every chance you get,* but today he’s outdone himself. Here’s just a snippet: FAFNIR: Now Mr Prospective Juror are you familiar with the defendant in this case? IRAQI: Hmmm, what did you say his name was? GIBLETS: Saddam Hussein. IRAQI: I have heard of him now and then, … Read more

Guardedly Good News to Sleep On.

I say ‘guardedly’ because King Abdullah II left himself a good bit of wiggle room, but he’s still showing public support for the new Iraqi government, including the possibility* of troops if necessary. In an interview Thursday with the British Broadcasting Corp. television “Newsnight” program, Abdullah said he wanted to support Iraqi Prime Minister Iyad … Read more

Chirac and Afghanistan

Yesterday there was much talk across the blogosphere about Chirac and Bush’s public exchange of words regarding Turkey and the EU. But Chirac did something far more damaging than that. He has blocked the deployment of NATO troops to safeguard the elections in Afghanistan. (Rueters cite): France has blocked a U.S. bid to deploy NATO’s … Read more

It looks like I was wrong…

…and in this particular case I won’t mind a bit: Three Turkish hostages ‘released’ THE extremist group responsible for beheading two foreign hostages was releasing three Turkish captives “for the sake of their Muslim brothers”, Al-Jazeera television said today. The Arab satellite station broadcast a videotape showing the three hostages kneeling in front of three … Read more

Not so Fast There, Mr. President

Stop the Music, stop the music. Turn down that spotlight a bit, would ya? I’m willing to give the Bush team credit for a very clever early transfer of “sovereignty” as a means to deflate any plans the insurgency may have had for June 30, but I’m not about to let this stand without comment: … Read more

Sovereignty: Hyperreal at hyperspeed

So much sooner than one would have expected, a potentially very real test of Iraq’s “soveriegnty” comes from a lawyer hired by Saddam’s wife. Ziad al-Khasawneh, one of 20 Jordanian and foreign lawyers appointed by Saddam’s wife, Sajidah, said the United States has no legal basis to keep prisoners, including Saddam, now that it has … Read more

Going Medieval.

The very core of liberty secured by our Anglo-Saxon system of separated powers has been freedom from indefinite imprisonment at the will of the Executive. (From Scalia’s dissent in Hamdi v. Rumsfeld; Scalia dissented because he would go further than the plurality in the Hamdi case, which found the detention justified but, contra the Bush … Read more

Martial Law: Good for Iraq! Good for the US? …and a few thoughts on SCOTUS

Will the newly re-“sovereign”-ized Iraq need to impose martial law? Mere hours after the surprisingly early handover, whispers are already circulating that a severe Iraq-implemented clampdown (which would certainly have caused outrage had the US tried it) is Plan A to deal with the insurgency. Who’s going to be watching to ensure any clampdown stays this side of Husseinesque is a good question, but I can see the wisdom of letting the Iraqi’s themselves call this shot.

Having said that, there is this bit of confusion to clear up (from a few days ago):

The US-led occupation authority in Baghdad has warned Iraq’s interim government not to carry out its threat of declaring martial law, insisting that only the US-led coalition has the right to adopt emergency powers after the June 30 handover of sovereignty. [emphasis mine: Sounds like a funny kind of full sovereignty to me, but….]

Senior American officials say Iraq’s authorities are bound by human rights clauses in the interim constitution, known as the Transitional Administrative Law, prohibiting administrative detention.

But they say the recent United Nations Security Council resolution 1546 sanctions the use by foreign forces in Iraq of “all necessary measures” to provide security.

A senior coalition official in Baghdad said: “Under the UN resolution, the multinational force will have the power to take all actions traditionally associated with martial law.” He said they had raised their legal objections with Iyad Allawi, Iraq’s prime minister.

Mr Allawi on Tuesday appeared to back away from remarks made on Sunday that the government would assume emergency powers after the handover.

“No, I didn’t specifically say martial law meaning martial law,” he said, adding that the government was developing a “public safety law” which would allow it to implement curfews, searches, and “apprehend the enemies of Iraq”.

Well, so long as he didn’t mean “martial law meaning martial law.” Besides, he really should leave that kind of legally nebulous acrobatic nonsense to the professionals; like George Bush’s 9 closest friends.

Read more

Here we go.

In a surprise move, sovereignty has been formally transferred to the Iraqi government two days early: BAGHDAD, Iraq – The U.S.-led coalition transferred sovereignty to an interim Iraqi government Monday, speeding the move by two days in an apparent bid to surprise insurgents and prevent them from trying to sabotage the step toward self rule. … Read more

al-Qaeda poised to commit another act of necromancy.

Because it’s long since time that we started calling things like this by their true names, don’t you think? As always, my sympathies to the victims and their families: I wish that I could say that they will be released, unharmed, but of course that would be almost certainly a lie.

By now it should be clear to even the most foolish observer that kidnapping hostages and threatening to murder them if the terrorists’ demands are not met is not going to accomplish said terrorists’ goals. It didn’t work with us, it didn’t work with the Italians, it didn’t work with the South Koreans and it won’t work with the Turks. We are continuing to do what we deem necessary and appropriate, in a manner and timing as close to our own choosing as is humanly possible, and the multiple visions of groups of masked Islamist terrorists oh-so-courageously striking down one single helpless captive with knives is somehow failing to impress us with either their bravery or the inevitability of their victory. Indeed, they are doing their best to highlight the moral gulf between their cause and ours, to their detriment; I appreciate this, although I somehow doubt that they intended to do that for us.

They are also obviously not acting in the tenets of mainstream Islam, as even a cursory understanding of that religion would show. Yes, I am aware of the flaws in that faith; you will note that I am not an adherent myself, which should be diagnostic of my opinion of it. But it is not even remotely an pernicious belief system, it does not celebrate ritual murder and it does not permit the wanton acts of cruelty and evil that al-Qaeda routinely plans and carries out. I believe that my God and the Allah of Islam are One*; I find no such commonality between my Deity and al-Qaeda’s.

So, not geopolitics, not true religious belief… we’re left with maltheism and necromancy. I don’t know whether they think that they’re entered on this course of human sacrifice in order to appease or entice their god; either way it will avail them not. We’re still going to win.

And I think that the terrorists know it, too. Why else take the time-honored tactic of mountebanks everywhere and ‘call for’ protests that they knew full well would occur anyway, if not to give themselves wiggle room for when their sacrifices do not produce the desired effects?

(Via OTB)

Moe

Read more

Silly CINO Spinning

The spin contortions the CPA’s going through to make it look like Iraq will have “full sovereignty” after June 30 are worthy of a surrealistic performance art piece (think Riviera in Neuromancer). This time it’s in the form of some CINO nonsense (Custody in Name Only): The United States will hand legal custody of Saddam … Read more

The Double-Standard of the William Krar Case

Krugman’s been on Ashcroft’s case recently. First he questioned the timing of his press conferences and how the announcement of the arrest of a terrorist in the heartland just so happens to deflect attention from some embarrassment for the Administration again and again. Today, Paul’s spouting off about the William Krar double-standard: In April 2003, … Read more

Waiting.

The South Korean government has announced that it will continue to send troops to the Middle East… which means that hostage Kim Sun-il is dead. We’re just waiting for the confirmatory footage, that’s all. My prayers for him and my sympathies to his family and his country. Let us make no mistake: the terrorists who … Read more

Abu Ghraib lawsuit

Last week, as reported by the Associated Press and Reuters, lawyers in California filed a class action suit against several of the contractors working in Abu Ghraib and other Iraqi prisons. They’re suing under RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) and the Alien Torts Claims Act. The defendants are Titan, CACI, some of their … Read more

Hating the Other

There’s one thing I know. People learn how to hate those different from them: the other. I know this because my parents did an exemplary job of raising me without prejudice. It wasn’t until I reached high school that I first heard many of the stereotypes most kids my age had accepted as truths about different ethnic or racial groups. They’d tell a joke, and I wouldn’t get it because it relied on a shared understanding that all the people within this group were cheap or all the people within that group were stupid, or whatever.

I was shocked to hear an African American teacher I had explain some of the stereotypes she had to live with. “Where do they get that stuff?” I thought. Slowly I realized, because I had not been, that other people were deliberately taught these things. I had certainly met plenty of African Americans, or Greeks, or Scottish, or Polish, etc, but I didn’t associate their race or ethnicity with a particular set of personality traits or habits, because no one had taught me to do so. I accepted each person as a blank slate—someone who would reveal their character to me through their actions.

Much later I realized my parents do associate certain traits/habits to people within different groups. They are just as prejudiced as the average person in our hometown. I was surprised to learn this, but actually very impressed that they had been so careful about not passing those prejudices along to their children.

I thought about this while reading an op-ed piece in The New York Times by Waleed Ziad:

How the Holy Warriors Learned to Hate

I’ve gone rounds and round with folks who want to discuss the War on Terror as a religious war. I’ve been insisting all the while that we’re dealing not with a clash of civilizations or ideologies, but rather a clash of social classes and a thirst for power.

In as much as this involves Afghanistan and Pakistan, Waleed Ziad agrees:

Read more

Ghosts, living and dead

Most of you have probably already seen this story, which was on the front page of the NY Times today:

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, acting at the request of George J. Tenet, the director of central intelligence, ordered military officials in Iraq last November to hold a man suspected of being a senior Iraqi terrorist at a high-level detention center there but not list him on the prison’s rolls, senior Pentagon and intelligence officials said Wednesday.

This prisoner and other “ghost detainees” were hidden largely to prevent the International Committee of the Red Cross from monitoring their treatment, and to avoid disclosing their location to an enemy, officials said.

Maj. Gen. Antonio M. Taguba, the Army officer who in February investigated abuses at the Abu Ghraib prison, criticized the practice of allowing ghost detainees there and at other detention centers as “deceptive, contrary to Army doctrine, and in violation of international law.”

This prisoner was apparently not abused. They just forgot about him, and forgot to question him–despite their belief that he was a high ranking Ansar-el-Islam officer actively planning attacks on U.S. forces.

Other “ghost detainees” (see correction/update below)have died in U.S. custody. From a May 25 NY Times story:

Accounts from intelligence officials seem to indicate that the practice of keeping detainees off official prison rosters was widespread.

In one of several cases in which an Iraqi prisoner died at Abu Ghraib in connection with interrogations, a hooded man identified only by his last name, Jamadi, slumped over dead on Nov. 20 as he was being questioned by a C.I.A. officer and translator, intelligence officials said. The incident is being investigated by the C.I.A.’s inspector general, and military officials have said that the man, whose body was later packed in ice and photographed at Abu Ghraib, had never been assigned a prisoner number, an indication that he had never been included on any official roster at the prison.

(I’m almost sure this next excerpt from the same story, a few paragraphs later, describes the same prisoner. The article doesn’t make it totally clear, though.)

An American military policeman said in sworn testimony early last month that the man had been brought to Abu Ghraib by “O.G.A.,” initials for other government agency, or the C.I.A., with a sandbag over his head. Military guards took the prisoner to a shower room at the prison, which was used as a temporary interrogation center, according to the account by Specialist Jason A. Kenner of the 372nd Military Police Company.

“He went into the shower for interrogation and about an hour later he died on them,” said Specialist Kenner, whose account left unclear whether the detainee was examined by a doctor or given any military treatment before he died.

“When we put on his orange jumpsuit to take him to the tier, we were told not to take the sandbag off at all,” Specialist Kenner said. “After he passed, the sandbag was removed, and I saw that he was severely beaten on his face. At the time, they would interrogate people in the shower rooms. He was shackled to the wall.”

“Later that day,” Specialist Kenner added, “they decided to put him on ice.”

Today’s Times article says the Ansar-al-Islam suspect in Camp Cutter, “is believed to be the first to have been kept off the books at the orders of Mr. Rumsfeld and Mr. Tenet.”

What I want to know is, are the key words in that sentence “first…off the books” or “at the orders of Mr. Rumsfeld and Mr. Tenet”? Were other detainees held off the books before, without Rumsfeld’s authorization? Was Rumsfeld’s authorization always required to hold a detainee without recording his name?

If so, was there a specific authorization for each individual “ghost detainee”? Or a more general order to hold detainees without listing them on the prisoner rolls if CIA officials requested it?

If not, why was Rumsfeld’s authorization required for the Camp Cropper prisoner and not for others? It might be that the chain of command utterly broke down at Abu Ghraib and no one even bothered asking Rumsfeld; they just did what intelligence told them. But Camp Cropper wasn’t a model of organization either, if they just forget to interrogate this prisoner. And Tenet seems to have been very careful about getting DoD and White House approval for the CIA’s actions.

A note on the timing: The “ghost detainee” whose body was photographed at Abu Ghraib died on November 20, according to the NY Times story
(see correction below). Rumsfeld’s order to hold the Ansar-al-Islam suspect without listing him was issued “in November”, according to today’s Times story. This CBS news story and this CNN story says Rumsfeld’s order was about a prisoner code- or nick-named “Triple X.” This U.S. News story, say that General Ricardo Sanchez’ ordered military guards to keep “Triple X” off the rosters and away from Red Cross inspectors on November 18, 2003. Rumsfeld’s authorization would have been issued before Sanchez’ directive; I don’t know how long before. According to Newsweek, “[o]n Nov. 19, Abu Ghraib was formally handed over to tactical control of military-intelligence units.” So it’s hard to tell much from the timing.

I could editorialize on all this, but what’s the point.

Read more

You are now entering Interzone.

For some reason, I find the following to be both comforting and disturbing: In a city where few people drink, Baghdad’s sealed-off green zone counts at least seven bars, including a Thursday night disco, a sports bar, a British pub, a rooftop bar run by General Electric, and a bare-bones trai ler-tavern operated by the … Read more

The Stepford Vice President

So here’s a theory. Dick Cheney is actually a robot. Back in the early days of the Bush Administration, when he underwent “heart” surgery, he was actually Stepfordized. Admittedly, this theory has a few loose ends (mostly in that he’s certainly not any better looking now), but at least it offers a feasible explanation for his insistence that Hussein had ties to al Qaida (i.e, there’s a fatal error or short-circuit in his data access update loop or something like that).

From Marshall’s Gaggle report:

Read more

Fallujah as Favela

Maybe I haven’t been called a “lefty moonbat” enough recently, but I’m going to throw this out there before I forget why it seemed like such a good idea in the middle of the night last night.

On the DVD for “City of God” is a documentary film about the drug wars in Rio De Janeiro titled “News From A Personal War.” Interviews with police, drug dealers, prisoners, and favela (slum) dwellers paint as bleak a picture of urban violence as I’ve ever seen. This film is from 1997, so some of the circumstances may have changed…anyone knowing that to be the case, please don’t be shy about sharing.

In the documentary, the former police chief of Rio is interviewed extensively and (probably because he was just about to take another job when interviewed) offers some stunningly frank assessments of why his force is unable to make a dent in the ongoing war. Essentially, the problem boils down to easy access to guns. He draws a chilling parallel between the US government and its desire to close down the Columbian drug manufacturing plants from which deadly products find ways, despite supposedly earnest efforts, through customs and onto American streets and the US and European gun manufacturing plants from which deadly products find ways, despite supposedly earnest efforts, through customs and onto Brazilian streets.

Read more

Like Dogs

Worried that she is being scapegoated for the torture of prisoners in Abu Ghraib, Brig Gen Janis Karpinski is speaking out: Gen Karpinski said military intelligence took over part of the Abu Ghraib jail to “Gitmoize” their interrogations – make them more like what was happening in the US detention camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, … Read more

Extraordinary Rendition: Not Just for Republicans!

Until tonight, I knew vaguely that the policy of “extraordinary rendition”–sending terrorism suspects to countries that practice torture for interrogation–started under the Clinton administration. But I did not know any of the details.

Tonight I came across this 2001 Wall Street Journal story*, and learned the details:

CIA-Backed Team Used Brutal Means To Break Up Terrorist Cell in Albania

By ANDREW HIGGINS and CHRISTOPHER COOPER
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL

TIRANA, Albania — Ahmed Osman Saleh stepped off a minibus here in the Albanian capital in July 1998 and caught what would be his last glimpse of daylight for three days. As he paid the driver, Albanian security agents slipped a white cloth bag over Mr. Saleh’s head, bound his limbs with plastic shackles and tossed him into the rear of a hatchback vehicle.

Supervising the operation from a nearby car were agents from the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency.

Mr. Saleh’s Albanian captors sped over rutted roads to an abandoned air base 35 miles north of Tirana. There, recalled an Albanian security agent who participated, guards dumped the bearded self-confessed terrorist on the floor of a windowless bathroom.

After two days of interrogation by CIA agents and sporadic beatings by Albanian guards, Mr. Saleh was put aboard a CIA-chartered plane and flown to Cairo, according to the Albanian agent and a confession Egyptian police elicited from Mr. Saleh in September 1998. “I remained blindfolded until I got off the plane,” Mr. Saleh said in the confession, a document written in Arabic longhand that he signed at the bottom.

There were more beatings and torture at the hands of Egyptian authorities. And 18 months after he was grabbed outside the Garden of Games, a Tirana childrens’ park, Mr. Saleh was hanged in an Egyptian prison yard.

By the Script
His capture was one of five scripted and overseen by American agents as part of a covert 1998 operation to deport members of the Egyptian Jihad organization to Cairo from the Balkans. At the time, Egyptian Jihad was merging with Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda network. U.S. authorities considered the Tirana cell among the most dangerous terror outfits in Europe. The CIA has refused to acknowledge the 1998 operation. But privately, U.S. officials have described it as one of the most successful counterterrorism
efforts in the annals of the intelligence agency….

About a dozen U.S. agents arrived in Albania to plan the arrests, according to their Albanian counterparts. CIA and SHIK operatives spent three months devising the operation, often meeting in a conference room next to Mr. Klosi’s office.

On June 25, 1998, the Egyptian government issued a prearranged arrest warrant for Mr. Attiya, the forger, and demanded his deportation. Most such requests to Western countries had been ignored in the past, said Hisham Saraya, Egypt’s attorney general at the time. This one was not.

That day, while driving in his 1986 Audi in Tirana, Mr. Attiya found himself being trailed by an Albanian police car and another vehicle, he later recalled in his confession. He was stopped and arrested. The same day, Albanian security officers raided his home and found more than 50 plates and stamps used to produce fake visas and other bogus documents, according to court records from his 1999 trial.

Several days later, he was taken, handcuffed and blindfolded, to the abandoned air base, north of Tirana. “There, a private plane was waiting for me,” he said in his confession. Once in Cairo, he was blindfolded again and driven to Egypt’s state security offices on July 2, 1998. “Since then, the interrogations have not stopped,” he said.

Mr. Attiya later told his lawyer, Hafez Abu-Saada, that while being questioned, he was subjected to electrical shocks to his genitals, suspended by his limbs, dragged on his face, and made to stand for hours in a cell, with filthy water up to his knees. Mr. Abu-Saada, who represented all five members of the Tirana cell, subsequently recorded their complaints in a published report.

Also deported from Tirana was Mr. Naggar. He was nabbed in July 1998 by SHIK on a road outside of town. He, too, was blindfolded and spirited home on a CIA plane. In complaints in his confession and to his defense lawyer, Mr. Abu-Saada, Mr. Naggar said his Egyptian interrogators regularly applied electrical shocks to his nipples and penis.

Mr. Naggar’s brother, Mohamed, said in an interview that he and his relatives also were — and continue to be — harassed and tortured by Egyptian police. He said he had suffered broken ribs and fractured cheekbones. “They changed my features,” Mohamed Naggar said, touching his face.

About two weeks after Messrs. Attiya and Naggar were deported to Egypt, Albanian security agents took Mr. Tita, the dues-collector, from his Tirana apartment. They covered his head and put him on a plane. “After I was arrested, [Egyptian interrogators] hung me from my wrists and applied electricity to parts of my feet and back,” he said in his confession.

As the CIA operation drew to a close, an Arab newspaper in London published a letter on August 5, 1998, signed by the International Islamic Front for Jihad. The letter vowed revenge for the counterterrorism drive in Albania, promising to retaliate against Americans in a “language they will understand.”

Two days later, U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were blown up, killing 224 people. U.S. investigators have attributed the embassy bombings to al Qaeda and now believe the attacks were planned far in advance. At the time, American officials were rattled enough about the possible connection to the
Tirana arrests that they closed the U.S. Embassy there, moving the staff to a more-secure compound across town.

The embassy bombings didn’t stop the CIA from going after Mr. Saleh in Tirana. In August, Albanian security agents grabbed him outside the children’s park. During two months of detention in Egypt, he was suspended from the ceiling of his cell and given electrical shocks, he told his lawyer, Mr. Abu-Saada. Also rounded up was Essam Abdel-Tawwab, an Egyptian Jihad member who had lived for a time in Tirana before moving to Sofia, Bulgaria. He, too, later told Mr. Abu-Saada he was tortured. Egyptian prosecutors acknowledged in court documents that they observed a “recovered wound” on Mr. Tawwab’s body.

Bill Clinton is not President anymore, and I wasn’t a huge fan of his when he was. I already knew that part of the groundwork for the “extraordinary rendition” policy was laid during his presidency. I’ve said a hundred times that this is not and should not be a partisan issue. But apparently I am more naive and more partisan than I’d like to think, because when I read this article I was shocked that this could happen under a Democratic president. I promptly set to work on an internal list of the differences between this case, and Abu Ghraib and Maher Arar’s deportation:

–Unlike the Arar case and Abu Ghraib, most of the suspects tortured here were almost certainly terrorists who were actively planning to kill innocent people. The Tirana cell was started by Ayman Al-Zawahiri’s younger brother. While coerced confessions are unreliable, there is a lot of corroboration in this case. (Read the full article for details.) The CIA was not rounding up innocent Iraqis or people who’d had lunch with terrorists’ brothers’ acquaintances one time. They gathered a lot of evidence before they acted.

–This specific operation may not have been approved by anyone on the cabinet level, unlike Arar’s deportation. We don’t know the details of Clinton administration’s policy on “extraordinary renditions”, and according to at least one article they actually tried to get Egypt to comply with the torture convention and eventually cut ties to them when they refused. There was nothing like the concerted legal effort to justify torture that we’ve seen from the Bush administration.

–Most of these men were actual Egyptian citizens, some of whom had actually committed crimes in Egypt. Ahmed Saleh was wanted for a botched assassination attempt of a government minister, and a car bombing (that might be one or two incidents; I can’t tell from the article.) Shawki Attiya was wanted on forgery charges, though these may have been drawn up with CIA assistance. I don’t have any expertise on this subject, but this seems less flagrantly illegal than deporting a Canadian citizen changing planes in JFK to Syria.

Really, though, what’s the use? I prefer torturing the guilty to torturing the innocent, but torture is torture. It was still illegal. It was still wrong. It was still unnecessary.**

Read more

Meet Our Employees

As a follow up to the Guardian/Observer article I linked to in the last post, I decided to do some research into the human rights records of the countries where we have reportedly “rendered” terrorism suspects. Specifically, their use of torture.
To avoid debates about source credibility, and save time, I relied exclusively on the U.S. State Department’s 2003 Human Rights Reports.

The results are grim, and long, but I think they are important–even necessary–to read. These people are working for us. Not just with us, but for us. Our government is sending prisoners into their custody for interrogation.

Someone will probably argue that our survival is at stake, and we need allies in this fight, even unsavory ones. I agree. Someone may ask me if I think we were wrong to ally with Josef Stalin in World War 2. Of course I don’t think that. Someone may ask me if I think Egypt or Azerbaijan is worse than Stalin’s USSR. Again: of course not.

Alliances are fine and necessary. This is something else. I don’t believe Churchill and FDR ever sent German or Japanese prisoners of war to Siberia for interrogation.

With that out of the way, here are the results, in alphabetical order:

Read more

“We acted fully within the law…”

Two recent news items on “extraordinary rendition”: 1) Maher Arar’s lawyers allege that Canadian CSIS agents (the equivalent of CIA agents, I believe) travelled to Syria in 2002 and got copies of “confessions” that Syria had tortured out of him: In the submission, Arar’s counsel say James Lockyer and Michael Edelson, who both represented Arar … Read more