What Is Done In Our Name

by hilzoy From the NYT: “Next month, Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a Yemeni who was once a driver for Osama bin Laden, could become the first detainee to be tried for war crimes in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. By now, he should be busily working on his defense. But his lawyers say he cannot. They say Mr. … Read more

“He Didn’t Know Enough About The Group”

by hilzoy Quote Of The Day: “U.S. Congressional candidate Tony Zirkle is facing criticism from one of his primary opponents, and a host of people on the Internet, for speaking at an event over the weekend that celebrated Adolf Hitler’s birthday. Zirkle confirmed to The News-Dispatch on Monday he spoke Sunday in Chicago at a … Read more

Africa News

by hilzoy It’s National Malaria Day. Harold Pollack points out that for a mere $10, you can buy a bed net that will save a kid’s life, and keep on saving it for four years. I think that’s a pretty good deal. (Here’s a good story on efforts to eradicate malaria — its focus is … Read more

White Christmas

by hilzoy Steve Benen asks: what if a Democrat had said this? “Talk show host Rush Limbaugh is sparking controversy again after he made comments calling for riots in Denver during the Democratic National Convention this summer. He said the riots would ensure a Democrat is not elected as president, and his listeners have a … Read more

Ledbetter

by hilzoy The Republicans successfully filibustered the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act yesterday: “Senate Republicans on Wednesday blocked a measure intended to overturn a Supreme Court decision limiting pay discrimination suits in a politically charged vote certain to be replayed in the presidential and Congressional campaigns. By a vote of 56 to 42, the Senate … Read more

Credibility

by hilzoy David Broder strikes again: “In an age of deep cynicism about politicians of both parties, McCain is the rare exception who is not assumed to be willing to sacrifice personal credibility to prevail in any contest.” And why, one might ask, does the unnamed being whose assumptions are described in the passive voice … Read more

PA Open Thread

by hilzoy In an astonishing development, the networks have all called the Republican primary for John McCain. They are also just now calling the Democratic primary for Clinton. This is, of course, no surprise; the important thing is the margin of victory. Having been out of the loop, I have no insights to offer, other … Read more

Democrats: You Can Do Better

by hilzoy Last month I wrote about John McCain’s statement claimed that there is “strong evidence” that thimerosal in vaccines causes autism. I expect better from Democrats, and while saying that we don’t know whether vaccines cause autism is better than saying that they do (or did, while thimerosal was still used), it’s not better … Read more

Mr. Clean

by hilzoy From the NYT: “Donald R. Diamond, a wealthy Arizona real estate developer, was racing to snap up a stretch of virgin California coast freed by the closing of an Army base a decade ago when he turned to an old friend, Senator John McCain. When Mr. Diamond wanted to buy land at the … Read more

Open Thread: Jetlag And Generals

by hilzoy Since I finished my 33 hour (door to door) stint of traveling yesterday evening, I have been doing the following: (1) Sleeping. Unfortunately, only in little tiny increments: I seem to be on several different sleep schedules at once, and one or another of them is always waking me up. (2) Cleaning things. … Read more

OK, Now I Care

by hilzoy Hillary Clinton really should not have gotten into the business of talking about who has contempt for which voters. By all accounts, she is ambitious and hard-hitting. That means that she has, in all likelihood, said any number of things that could be taken to express contempt for various groups of voters. And … Read more

Scary Stuff

by hilzoy John McCain recently outlined his economic platform (again), and it would be funny if he wasn’t apparently quite serious about it. The fact that he is is terrifying. Here we are, in the middle of an economic meltdown, and one of our two nominees is someone whose ignorance of economics is truly boundless. … Read more

I Don’t Care

by hilzoy Here’s the latest in the “who doesn’t care about the working class?” parade: “In January 1995, as the Clintons were licking their wounds from the 1994 congressional elections, a debate emerged at a retreat at Camp David. Should the administration make overtures to working class white southerners who had all but forsaken the … Read more

By Popular Request…

by hilzoy Open Thread! And while I’m here: here’s a fascinating story about attempts to promote good government in Congo: “One recent afternoon in this booming mining town, in a provincial office crammed with files, something unusual was happening for a country once ruled by the famously kleptocratic dictator Mobutu Sese Seko. A mid-level government … Read more

Approving Torture: Better Late Than Never?

by hilzoy As has been noted in comments, we haven’t written about the this story: “In dozens of top-secret talks and meetings in the White House, the most senior Bush administration officials discussed and approved specific details of how high-value al Qaeda suspects would be interrogated by the Central Intelligence Agency, sources tell ABC News. … Read more

The War Of Ideas

by hilzoy Steve Benen linked to this, um, fascinating article by Michael Medved on why America should never elect an atheist President. He offers three main reasons. The first two are risible: (1) How on earth would an atheist issue a Thanksgiving proclamation? or say the Pledge of Allegiance? and (2) a President needs to … Read more

Food Prices

by hilzoy

Paul Krugman in today’s NYT:

“These days you hear a lot about the world financial crisis. But there’s another world crisis under way — and it’s hurting a lot more people.

I’m talking about the food crisis. Over the past few years the prices of wheat, corn, rice and other basic foodstuffs have doubled or tripled, with much of the increase taking place just in the last few months. High food prices dismay even relatively well-off Americans — but they’re truly devastating in poor countries, where food often accounts for more than half a family’s spending.

There have already been food riots around the world. Food-supplying countries, from Ukraine to Argentina, have been limiting exports in an attempt to protect domestic consumers, leading to angry protests from farmers — and making things even worse in countries that need to import food.”

Krugman has a good rundown on the causes of the shortage. (I’d add the Iowa caucuses to the list of culprits — read his article to see why. Yet another reason to actually rotate the first primaries and caucuses away from Iowa and New Hampshire.) But just to provide an illustration that’s all over the papers here in Karachi, but not that widely covered in the US:

” Nearly half of Pakistan’s 160 million people are at risk of going short of food due to a surge in prices, the World Food Programme said on Friday.

The WFP survey covering the year to March showed the number of people deemed “food insecure” had risen 28 percent to 77 million from 60 million in the previous year.

The WFP estimates that anyone consuming less than 2,350 calories per day is below the food security line.

Sahib Haq, an official with the WFP’s Vulnerability Analysis & Mapping Unit in Pakistan, said food prices rose at least 35 percent in the past year compared with an 18 percent rise in minimum wages.

“There is a very big gap between the increase in prices and increase in wages … the purchasing power of the poor has gone down by almost 50 percent,” Haq said. (…)

The price of wheat flour in January was between 24-25 rupees (38 U.S. cents) per kg in three of Pakistan’s four provinces, compared with 15 rupees per kg in January 2007, the WFP said.

Prices have since moderated to around 17 rupees but are expected to shoot up 40 percent or more in the coming months, according to grain industry officials.

“There will be a big crisis,” Haq said. (…)

Prices for rice, vegetables and cooking oil have also risen sharply, and the economic hardships faced by ordinary people played a big part in an election in February that resulted in President Pervez Musharraf’s political allies being thrown out of government.

The new coalition government, which took power last month, raised the support price it pays farmers to buy wheat to ensure adequate supplies, but Haq said the move would result in sharply higher flour prices in months ahead.

The consumer price index, a key indicator of inflation, rose 11.25 percent in February from a year ago, mainly due to food prices.

Due to the previous administration’s reluctance to reduce subsidies for food and fuel, the government is saddled with a widening fiscal deficit. While wanting to alleviate the hardship of the poor, the new government will face some painful economic choices. ($1 = 62.85 Pakistani rupees) (Editing by Simon Cameron-Moore and Alex Richardson)”

Pakistan was not particularly well off before food prices shot up. Its GDP per capita was well below $1,000/year. But half the population facing food insecurity is another thing entirely. Likewise, a decline in purchasing power of 50%. The poor here didn’t have much purchasing power to start with.

And Pakistan is not alone. This is happening all over the developing world. It’s worth keeping an eye on, and making a donation if you have the money.

Read more

Jackson Will Resign

by hilzoy Via TPM, the WSJ: “Housing and Urban Development Secretary Alphonso Jackson is expected to announce his resignation Monday, according to people familiar with the matter, a decision that will deal a blow to the Bush administration’s efforts to tackle the housing and mortgage mess. The exact reasons for Mr. Jackson’s decision couldn’t be … Read more

Meet McCain’s Economics Advisor

by hilzoy

I’m late getting to John McCain’s speech on the housing crisis, in which he promised to do next to nothing to help homeowners, to convene a meeting of accountants, to cut taxes, and, in a surprising break with most economists here on planet earth, to respond to the present financial problems by cutting regulation [UPDATE: as von notes, this is McCain’s response to what he calls “an explosion of complex financial instruments that weren’t particularly well understood by even the most sophisticated banks, lenders and hedge funds” As von correctly notes, McCain does propose new regulation on mortgage lenders. END UPDATE.] The idea that overregulation is at the heart of our present predicament might seem counterintuitive. But the fact that McCain believes it is a lot easier to understand when you realize that his chief economic advisor and general campaign co-chair is Phil Gramm, who seems never to have met a financial regulation he didn’t want to destroy.

Gramm, who has been described as “McCain’s econ brain” and “the expert he turns to on the subject,” didn’t just oppose financial regulations in general. He helped to create the conditions for the mortgage crisis, and others, in quite specific ways. Lisa Lerer at Politico has more:

“The general co-chairman of John McCain’s presidential campaign, former Sen. Phil Gramm (R-Texas), led the charge in 1999 to repeal a Depression-era banking regulation law that Democrat Barack Obama claimed on Thursday contributed significantly to today’s economic turmoil. (…)

A year after the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act repealed the old regulations, Swiss Bank UBS gobbled up brokerage house Paine Weber. Two years later, Gramm settled in as a vice chairman of UBS’s new investment banking arm.

Later, he became a major player in its government affairs operation. According to federal lobbying disclosure records, Gramm lobbied Congress, the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department about banking and mortgage issues in 2005 and 2006.

During those years, the mortgage industry pressed Congress to roll back strong state rules that sought to stem the rise of predatory tactics used by lenders and brokers to place homeowners in high-cost mortgages.

For his work, Gramm and two other lobbyists collected $750,000 in fees from UBS’s American subsidiary. In the past year, UBS has written down more then $18 billion in exposure to subprime loans and other risky securities and is considering cutting as many as 8,000 jobs.”

The 1999 bill that Gramm sponsored overturned the Glass-Steagall Act, which (among other things) separated investment banks from ordinary banks. Gramm’s bill was an enormously important piece of financial legislation, and by allowing banks and brokerages to merge, it set in place some of the conditions that hampered scrutiny of mortgage-backed securities, and made the damage from the present meltdown harder to contain. As Paul Krugman wrote last week:

“I’d argue that aside from Alan Greenspan, nobody did as much as Mr. Gramm to make this crisis possible.”

Isn’t that comforting?

But Gramm isn’t just involved in this economic meltdown…

Read more

Iraq: Roundup

by hilzoy

This is not good at all:

“U.S. forces in armored vehicles battled Mahdi Army fighters Thursday in the vast Shiite stronghold of Sadr City, and military officials said Friday that U.S. aircraft bombed militant positions in the southern city of Basra, as the American role in a campaign against party-backed militias appeared to expand. Iraqi army and police units appeared to be largely holding to the outskirts of the Sadr City fighting, as U.S. troops took the lead.

Four U.S. Stryker armored vehicles were seen in Sadr City by a Washington Post correspondent, one of them engaging Mahdi Army militiamen with heavy fire. The din of U.S. weapons, along with the Mahdi Army’s AK-47s and rocket-propelled grenades, was heard through much of the day. U.S. helicopters and drones buzzed overhead.

The clashes suggested that American forces were being drawn more deeply into a broad offensive that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite, launched in the southern city of Basra on Tuesday, saying death squads, criminal gangs and rogue militias were the targets. The Mahdi Army of cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, a Shiite rival of Maliki, appeared to have taken the brunt of the attacks; fighting spread to many southern cities and parts of Baghdad.”

And this just makes it worse:

“Maliki decided to launch the offensive without consulting his U.S. allies, according to administration officials. With little U.S. presence in the south, and British forces in Basra confined to an air base outside the city, one administration official said that “we can’t quite decipher” what is going on. It’s a question, he said, of “who’s got the best conspiracy” theory about why Maliki decided to act now.

In Basra, three rival Shiite groups have been trying to position themselves, sometimes through force of arms, to dominate recently approved provincial elections.

The U.S. officials, who were not authorized to speak on the record, said that they believe Iran has provided assistance in the past to all three groups: the Mahdi Army; the Badr Organization of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, Iraq’s largest Shiite party; and forces loyal to the Fadhila Party, which holds the Basra governor’s seat. But the officials see the current conflict as a purely internal Iraqi dispute.

Some officials have concluded that Maliki himself is firing “the first salvo in upcoming elections,” the administration official said.

“His dog in that fight is that he is basically allied with the Badr Corps” against forces loyal to Sadr, the official said. “It’s not a pretty picture.””

It’s made even less pretty by the reports that Iraqi forces are holding back and letting us take the lead, or not fighting at all, or switching sides:

“Abu Iman barely flinched when the Iraqi Government ordered his unit of special police to move against al-Mahdi Army fighters in Basra.

His response, while swift, was not what British and US military trainers who have spent the past five years schooling the Iraqi security forces would have hoped for. He and 15 of his comrades took off their uniforms, kept their government-issued rifles and went over to the other side without a second thought.”

So: Maliki launched an assault on the Mahdi Army without telling us. [UPDATE: Eric Martin says: don’t take the claim that we weren’t told at face value. He’s right. END UPDATE] We’re not sure why he did this, but it appears to be about internal Iraqi politics. And yet, for some reason, our forces are heavily involved, and possibly taking the lead.

More below the fold.

Read more

Read It And Weep

by hilzoy Via Bitch Ph.D., the WSJ: “A collision with a semi-trailer truck seven years ago left 52-year-old Deborah Shank permanently brain-damaged and in a wheelchair. Her husband, Jim, and three sons found a small source of solace: a $700,000 accident settlement from the trucking company involved. After legal fees and other expenses, the remaining … Read more

Chain Of Fools

by hilzoy

This is pretty extraordinary:

“Since 2006, when the insurgency in Afghanistan sharply intensified, the Afghan government has been dependent on American logistics and military support in the war against Al Qaeda and the Taliban.

But to arm the Afghan forces that it hopes will lead this fight, the American military has relied since early last year on a fledgling company led by a 22-year-old man whose vice president was a licensed masseur.

With the award last January of a federal contract worth as much as nearly $300 million, the company, AEY Inc., which operates out of an unmarked office in Miami Beach, became the main supplier of munitions to Afghanistan’s army and police forces.

Since then, the company has provided ammunition that is more than 40 years old and in decomposing packaging, according to an examination of the munitions by The New York Times and interviews with American and Afghan officials. Much of the ammunition comes from the aging stockpiles of the old Communist bloc, including stockpiles that the State Department and NATO have determined to be unreliable and obsolete, and have spent millions of dollars to have destroyed.

In purchasing munitions, the contractor has also worked with middlemen and a shell company on a federal list of entities suspected of illegal arms trafficking.

Moreover, tens of millions of the rifle and machine-gun cartridges were manufactured in China, making their procurement a possible violation of American law. The company’s president, Efraim E. Diveroli, was also secretly recorded in a conversation that suggested corruption in his company’s purchase of more than 100 million aging rounds in Albania, according to audio files of the conversation.”

That’s a pretty impressive list of problems, if I ask me. Could it possibly get worse? Well, yes. I left out the entire domestic violence angle, and the bit about the head of the company having a forged driver’s license that would have made him ineligible for contracts if he hadn’t gone into a diversion program for first offenders. That’s a tangent. This is the main point:

Read more

Nicholas Kristof Says The N Word

by hilzoy No, not that one. The one that is, for a Democrat, the worst insult of all: “Yes, Hillary Rodham Clinton may still have a chance of winning the Democratic nomination. But it’s probably smaller than the chance that a continued slugfest will hand the White House to John McCain. (…) Mrs. Clinton’s chances … Read more

It’s 3am. Do You Know Where Joe Lieberman Is?

by hilzoy Harold Meyerson: “It is 3 a.m., and the stillness of the White House night is shattered by the ringing of the red phone. President John McCain, rousing himself from a deep sleep, turns on the light and picks up the receiver. A U.S. embassy in a Middle Eastern country, he is told, has … Read more

Quick Links (Obama Edition)

by hilzoy Some interesting pieces: (1) Spencer Ackerman has a very good piece on Obama’s foreign policy team: “They also share a formative experience with each other and with Obama. Each opposed the Iraq War at a time when doing so was derided by their colleagues, by journalists, and by the foreign-policy establishment. Each did … Read more

“Seriously Misguided”

by hilzoy

Some people have wondered: in all those retrospectives on the fifth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, why were there so few people who actually opposed the war from the outset? Megan McArdle thinks that that’s “seriously misguided”:

“We learn by gambling on what we think the best answer is, and seeing how it turns out. Most of us know that we have learned more about the world, and ourselves, from failing than from success. Success can be accidental; failure is definite. Failure tells us exactly what doesn’t work.

Failure tells us more than success because success is usually a matter of a whole system. And as development economists have proven over and over and over again, those complex webs of interactions are impossible to tease apart into one or two concrete actions. Things can fail, on the other hand, at a single point. And even when they fail in multiple ways, those ways are usually more obvious than the emergent interactions that produced a success. (…)

The people who were right can (and will) rewrite their memories of what they believed to show themselves in the most attractive light; they will come to honestly believe that they were more prescient than they were. (…) The people who failed will also do this. But unlike the people who were right, there is a central fact stopping them from flattering themselves too much: things are blowing up in Iraq and people are dying. Thus they will have to look for some coherent explanation.”

There’s something right about what McArdle says, and something wrong. To start with the first: most of us sometimes get things right, and sometimes get things wrong. Suppose God grants you the chance to question someone about an important decision, and gives you the choice: would you rather question that person after she has screwed up, or after she has gotten something right? Other things being equal, I think I’d rather question the person after she screws up, for more or less the reasons McArdle suggests. Notice, though, that in this case, we have to choose whether or not to question one and the same person after a success or a failure. The identity of that person, and with it, her good or bad judgment, her wisdom or naivete, and so forth, is held constant; and this is essential to the example.

The question McArdle claims to be asking is a different one: given a particular decision, would you rather question the people who got it right or those who got it wrong? Here what we hold constant is not the people we question, but the decision itself. And that makes all the difference in the world.

Different people have different track records. On foreign policy, George Kennan had a very good track record: he got a lot of things right, including some very difficult ones. That is in large part due to the fact that he knew a lot and had exceptionally good judgment. Jonah Goldberg, by contrast, has a terrible track record: he gets things wrong all the time, and when he gets them right, it seems to be more or less by coincidence. That is because he knows almost nothing and has terrible judgment. Their respective track records mean that on any given decision, people with good judgment, like George Kennan, are much more likely to have gotten it right than to have gotten it wrong, while the opposite is true of people with bad judgment, like Jonah Goldberg.*

If I ask myself whether I would rather hear from the people who got a given question right or wrong, I can assume that the people with good judgment on questions of that type will be overrepresented among those who got it right, and underrepresented among those who got it wrong; and that the opposite will hold true of the people with bad judgment. So one way to think about the question: who would I rather hear from? is that it is a question about whether I would rather hear from people likely to have good judgment, like George Kennan, or people who are likely to have bad judgment, like Jonah Goldberg. This is, frankly, not a hard call to make at all.

However, as McArdle notes, a given person who has just gotten something very wrong is more likely to have something interesting to say about it than she would be had she just gotten it right. If the differences between people with good judgment and people with bad judgment were very small, or the additional insight conferred by confronting one’s own errors were very large, then the effects of having just made a mistake might be big enough to swamp the effect of having good judgment overall. In that case, even though the people who got something wrong would be likely to have had worse judgment initially than the people who got it right, the fact that they had just gotten something wrong might make them suddenly become more interesting and better to talk to, on the whole, than the group who got things right.

Obviously, though, this isn’t the way it works. First, the difference between George Kennan and Jonah Goldberg is very, very large. Second, the fact that Jonah Goldberg has terrible judgment doesn’t just lead him to screw up foreign policy; it also makes him far less likely to learn from his mistakes than George Kennan would. Someone who is thoughtful, perceptive, and insightful, and who had gotten the Iraq war wrong, might find his or her judgment changed forever, in very interesting ways. (Then again, George Kennan would be almost as likely to learn something really interesting from observing other people’s errors. He would be interesting to talk to either way.) Jonah Goldberg, by contrast, seems to have learned nothing whatsoever from his mistakes. And this doesn’t seem to be entirely unrelated to the defects that made him get Iraq wrong at the outset. He was a shallow, thoughtless idiot then, and he is a shallow, thoughtless idiot now.

And this is what’s so wrong about what Megan McArdle says. She is making an argument whose natural application is to the question: given one person, would you be likely to learn more from her after she had gotten something right or after she had gotten something wrong? And she is extrapolating it to the quite different question: would you rather talk to the people who got a given decision right or wrong? It would be fine to extrapolate in this way if the fact that someone got that question right or wrong showed nothing whatsoever about their wisdom or judgment; if the George Kennans and Jonah Goldbergs of this world were tossed at random into either category.

But that’s not the way things work. Decisions reveal things about those who make them. People who get them right are, on average, more likely to have wisdom and judgment and insight than those who get them wrong. This means that they are both more likely to be worth talking to in general, and more likely to profit from any mistakes they make, than people who get them wrong.

This is what McArdle missed. It’s an interesting omission for someone who, by her own account, got Iraq wrong.

In her post, McArdle suggests that people who get a decision right are likely to revise their memories “to show themselves in the most attractive light”, and that this kind of self-deception is more difficult for those who got it wrong. Her own post, with its implicit assumption that major errors do not reflect anything about the judgment of those who make them, suggests that people who get things wrong are just as prone to self-deception as the rest of us.

(See also: Richard “we were right to be wrong” Cohen.)

Read more

Bad News

by hilzoy This could be very, very bad news: “Serious fighting broke out Tuesday in Basra and Baghdad, Iraq’s largest cities, between restive members of Iraq’s biggest Shiite militia and Iraqi Army forces backed by American troops. The scale and intensity of the clashes kept many residents home in Baghdad. Barrages of what appeared to … Read more

Where’s The Gratitude?

by hilzoy

I was just going to ignore Pat Buchanan’s screed on the subject of Obama’s speech — in many ways, its title, “A Brief For Whitey”, tells you everything you need to know about it. However, on reflection, I did want to highlight one bit:

“First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known.

Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.

Second, no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the ’60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream. (…)

We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude?”

I’m not going to focus on the idiocy of going on about how grateful blacks should be to whites without so much as mentioning the two centuries of slavery, the century of peonage and terrorism, and the fact that when blacks finally won civil rights, it was hardly due to a spontaneous surge of generosity on the part of whites. I take it that’s all too obvious to be worth saying. What I do want to focus on is the peculiar idea that things like “welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs” constitute things whites did for blacks. Because that’s just false. Ta-Nehisi Coates:

“There is a lot wrong here, but one central thread of errant logic undergirds it all. Buchanan, like most racists, doesn’t actually believe that African-Americans are Americans. This isn’t an interpretation, Buchanan’s argument that white Americans, in the form of social programs, have done more for black people than any group (including presumably the entire Civil Rights Movement!) assumes that black people have never paid any taxes for those programs. He quite literally doesn’t categorize black people as Americans, but useless layabouts who’ve never contributed anything to the country.”

Taking Buchanan’s errors one by one:

Read more

McCain On Taxes

by hilzoy Robert Gordon and James Kvaal have done us all a service by examining McCain’s proposals on taxes. According to his website, McCain wants to do the following: (a) Repeal the Alternative Minimum Tax. The AMT was designed to keep the very rich from using loopholes to avoid paying any taxes. Unfortunately, the cutoff … Read more

4000

by hilzoy

Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead. Dead.

Read more

“We Just Ran With Our Heads Down”

by hilzoy A few days ago, Hillary Clinton described her 1996 trip to Bosnia: “I certainly do remember that trip to Bosnia, and as Togo said, there was a saying around the White House that if a place was too small, too poor, or too dangerous, the president couldn’t go, so send the First Lady. … Read more

FEC Filings!

by hilzoy The candidates have now filed their FEC reports for February (Obama, Clinton, McCain.) As I wrote about a month ago, the FEC believes that McCain might be subject to the spending caps that go with public financing because of a loan he accepted, in which he promised that if he lost, he would … Read more

The Past

by hilzoy

I was thinking, as I read some of the commentary about Rev. Wright, that at least some of the people I read didn’t seem to realize just how recently African-Americans were literally terrorized on a regular basis; and in that context it occurred to me that I didn’t know exactly how old Rev. Wright was. So I looked him up in Wikipedia, and found that he was born in 1941. And it struck me: that would make him the same age as Emmett Till:

“In August of 1955, one year and three months after Brown v. Board of Education, a fourteen-year-old black boy unschooled in the racial customs of the South traveled to Mississippi to visit relatives. With adolescent bravado, he whistled at Carolyn Bryant, a white woman. This inadvertent violation of a sacred code of the South cost him his life. Two white men dragged Till from his bed in the dead of night, beat him, and shot him through the head. Three days later his mangled body was pulled from the Tallahatchie River. It was Emmett Till’s first visit to the South. Eight days after arriving in Money, Mississippi, where the town line was marked with a sign reading, “Money — a good place to raise a boy,” Emmett Till was dead.

If not for one extraordinary decision of Mamie Till, Emmett’s mother, the story may have ended there. At the urging of civil rights leaders, Mamie Till decided to leave the casket open at her son’s funeral. She told the mortician not to “fix” her son’s face. The world would see what had been done to him. Tens of thousands of people viewed Emmett Till’s body, which was on display in a Chicago church for four long days. Gruesome photos of his maimed and distorted face flooded the national and international press. America was shocked out of comfortable complacency, and the Till case became international news. (…)

Till’s uncle identified the assailants in court — the first time a black person had testified against a white in Mississippi, and perhaps in the South. He was forced to leave town. After a five-day trial that made an open mockery of the possibility of justice, the defendants were acquitted. The Bryants celebrated, on camera, with a smile and an embrace.”

060919_till_vmed_4pwidec

That’s a photo of Emmett Till while he was still alive. To see a photo of what remained of his face — and photos like this were printed in Jet and circulated around the world — click here. It’s not pleasant to look at, but if you haven’t seen it before, you should steel yourself and try.

American Experience did a show on Till’s murder, and their website has reminiscences from people like Wright, who were about Till’s own age, and black:

“I was a senior at Los Angeles High School in California. It had a profound affect on me because I understood that it could have happened to any of us. It shook my confidence. It was as though terrorists had struck — but it was terrorists from our own country. It made me want to do everything I could to make sure this event would not happen ever again.

Johnnie L. Cochran, Jr., high-profile trial lawyer

My memories are exact — and parallel those of many others my age — I felt vulnerable for the first time in my life — Till was a year younger — and recall believing that this could easily happen to me — for no reason at all. I lived in Pennsylvania at the time.

Julian Bond, civil rights leader and chairman, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People

Emmett Till and I were about the same age. A week after he was murdered… I stood on the corner with a gang of boys, looking at pictures of him in the black newspapers and magazines. In one, he was laughing and happy. In the other, his head was swollen and bashed in, his eyes bulging out of their sockets and his mouth twisted and broken. His mother had done a bold thing. She refused to let him be buried until hundreds of thousands marched past his open casket in Chicago and looked down at his mutilated body. [I] felt a deep kinship to him when I learned he was born the same year and day I was. My father talked about it at night and dramatized the crime. I couldn’t get Emmett out of my mind…

Muhammed Ali, boxer”

The murder of Emmett Till was not particularly unusual. Neither was the fact that the killers, though known to their community, were not brought to justice. (The jury deliberated for 67 minutes; one juror said that “they wouldn’t have taken so long if they hadn’t stopped to drink pop.”) What made it unusual was the actions of Till’s family: his mother’s decision to have an open casket funeral, and his uncle’s decision to testify against his killers in court.

Jeremiah Wright was fourteen when Till was killed. Though he did not live in the South, Jim Crow was in full force there until his early twenties. He was twenty one when George Wallace called for “segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.” He was a few days shy of twenty two when a bomb went off in a Birmingham church, killing four young girls who were at Sunday School, about a month shy of twenty three when Lyndon Johnson finally signed the Civil Rights Act, and almost twenty four when Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act.

By the time our country got around to guaranteeing voting rights for blacks, Jeremiah Wright had served his country in the Marine Corps for three years, and in the Navy for two more.

Read more