Thanks for covering it, btw*.

Von and Edward seem to be be on top of the Iraqi situation for the moment, so I’ll let them get on with it. For the record, I am not as pessimistic as either about what’s happening, although I recognize that they have both raised legitimate concerns and I’ll be regularly checking up on developments. I also recognize that they would both be profoundly relieved to have it proved to them that they were overestimating the danger posed by al-Sadr and his supporters. And if you’re looking for some good news, The Command Post (who got it from Normblog) has linked to a Guardian article that presents some hope that the Shi’a in Iraq are not going to vote in a theocracy after all. I wonder how this post will appear this time tomorrow: prescient, or just deeply naive?

I guess that we’ll see.

Moe

*Frustrating, it is, to not comment on news as it happens.

3 thoughts on “Thanks for covering it, btw*.”

  1. that’s good news.
    but their front pager is much more mixed, especially this quote:

    “The good news here is Sadr is just one extreme cleric we already knew was an extremist and by resisting firmly we will send a message,” said Michael O’Hanlon, a strategic analyst at the Brookings Institution in Washington. “The more nerve-racking news is that Sistani seems to be divided in his instincts.”

    I think that’s a fair snapshot of the situation, from a fair observer.

Comments are closed.