Cemeteries

by JanieM A couple of summers ago, after years of procrastination, I got a lawyer to help me rewrite my will. We also drafted a power of attorney for money matters and a health care advance directive. One of the reasons I had been procrastinating was that I wanted to write a novella-length response to … Read more

From the ObWi hivemind

by liberal japonicus Just to let you know, we’ve asked a few people to join the front page, with the key being they provide some new points of view. I’m closing the comments to this post as it is just an announcement, but if you have ideas or recommendations for others, drop a line to … Read more

The United States has no national security

by Doctor Science

This is not a drill, and I am not speaking rhetorically. I think the evidence shows that, at the White House level, the United States has *no* functioning national security, as the national security and intelligence communities understand it.

Most of the talk, as in the previous post, about the growing conflict between Trump and NS/IC is about Trump and his associates’ ties to Russia, and the extent to which they may be acting as Russian assets.

This is obviously a very serious charge that has to be investigated, post-haste. But a lot of us have been screaming our fool heads off about this for *months* without NS/IC going this far, so why now? What took them this long?

I wonder if the reason this has broken out now was the apparent use of the Mar-a-Lago terrace as a Situation Room. At Mar-a-Lago Trump and his staff showed themselves incapable of acting as part of a national security system. The whole intelligence community, the national security apparatus, and the military now saw, publicly, that classified or sensitive material given to the Trump White House will not be treated as such. It’s not as specific as “this particular person is compromised by Russia”, it’s a general failure to acknowledge that national security issues have special significance.

I’m cutting here because this post is long and has embedded tweets and other slow-down factors.

Read more

This view from a Former CIAer is Disturbing

by Ugh

Vox has an interview with "a 23-year veteran of the CIA and a former deputy officer on the National Intelligence Council."  I picked this up in my twitter feed, that person describing it as "chilling."  But I think they meant chilling from an "isn't Trump a horrible threat?" perspective, although perhaps not.  But my take away is that the intelligence community – or at least this person who spent more than two decades working in it – is full of themselves (and "it") and feels entitled to undermine the President of the United States if they view him as sufficiently not to their liking.

More below.

Read more

unexpected but welcome

by russell Leaving the flaming hulk of the Trump administration aside for a moment, I thought this piece from Reuters to be of interest.  Unexpected, but welcome. tl;dr – big pharma is not all that interested in a massive rollback of FDA regulation.   The primary reason seems to be that drugs that actually make it … Read more

Hacking Trump’s Brain

by Doctor Science A few days ago media guru Dan Pfeiffer tweeted: Trump might be the most predictable human on earth https://t.co/GmmtMlM4j6 — Dan Pfeiffer (@danpfeiffer) February 6, 2017 So-called President* Trump is also easily influenced (especially by the last person he spoke to), and is, of course, probably the most influential person in the … Read more

He May be a Dumpster Fire, but he’s OUR Dumpster Fire (Open Thread)

by Ugh The Magical Mystery Reality Show of Doom, Tacos and Discontinued Clothing Lines continues here in the United States of Fnckin' A.  While Week 3 showed a slight down-tick in pictures of CBP-handcuffed pre-Kers and other similar defenses of the national security, we still managed to have our fair share of entertainment, in a "oh-god-we're-all-gonna'-die-pass-the-vodka-and-Valium" … Read more

bannon

by russell I've been curious about Steve Bannon, Trump's advisor.  Trump is pretty much a well-known quantity – what you see is what you get, who and what he is, is basically there to see.  I don't think there's any significant hidden depths behind the surface – what's on the surface is who he is. … Read more