by hilzoy
"Torture has been illegal for a number of years, and President Bush insisted just as strongly as Obama that the U.S. does not torture. There was a legitimate debate about waterboarding, which does no physical injury, and which I do not believe constitutes torture. But according to press reports, only two or three top-ranking terrorists were waterboarded, none after 2003. And waterboarding has been banned by the U.S. military since 2006. So what was Obama's purpose in implying that until he came along, his own government was engaged in torturing prisoners? His speech was carried live by Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya, broadcast into countries where "torture" doesn't mean getting your face wet. Obama at least impliedly exaggerated the supposed sins of his predecessors and the "change" brought about by himself. Why? For what purpose? Isn't the campaign over?"
Getting your face wet! That's clever. I await with great anticipation Hinderaker's characterization of some of our other interrogation tactics. Holding people in a coffin-sized cell: not giving them the luxury suite at George V. Stress positions: enforced yoga classes. Hitting someone's legs so often that the autopsy report claimed that they "had basically been pulpified": a soothing massage. (So soothing that it sent its recipient to an eternal rest!) Sensory deprivation: just like those nice little eyemasks the airlines give you, only more so!
Has Hinderaker ever tried being waterboarded? That might give us some reason to take his opinion more seriously the US military courts martial, or international tribunals.
Hinderaker doesn’t like to let facts or history get in the way of his opinions.
And if George Bush or Dick Cheney have said something, it’s god’s own truth.
Leaving aside the important points that have already been made to the effect that waterboarding is torture and that our government is directly responsible for horrific actions cruder than waterboarding and applied to far more than one or two detainees, the Bush administration doesn’t even pass the test Hinderaker sets: we actually kidnapped people for the express purpose of subjecting them to the tender mercies of the countries that even Mr. Hinderaker concedes commit acts of Actual Torture.
Maher Arar was taken from an American airport and sent to one of the countries to which Hinderaker alludes to be physically tortured:
In another case, that of Binyam Mohamed, we picked him up in Pakistan and sent him to at least three other countries; most relevantly to Mr. Hinderaker’s stated guidelines for what constitutes Torture, we consigned Mr. Mohamed to Morocco for a time, where his
But hey, whatever lets Hinderaker live with himself.
It was all just fraternity pranks.
“Getting your face wet is pretty clever,” but not nearly as clever as “impliedly exaggerated.”
Stupid fingers. The ” goes over to the left a bit.
“getting your face wet” : waterboarding :: “hanging around” : crucifixion
Goebbels would be proud of his disciples.
I’m against torture in every cases but one: people who justify torture should have to endure the procedures they defend. Waterboard Hinderaker, Sleep deprivation for Giuliani. Stress positions for Rumsfeld. Sexual humiliation for Limbaugh. On second thought scratch that last one. He might enjoy it.
Believing In Civil Liberties? Thats A Paddlin
This is beyond depressing:
Lawyers for Binyam Mohamed face the incredible prospect of a six-month jail sentence in America after writing a letter to President Obama detailing their clients allegations of torture by US agents
Clive Staffor…