In the only news worth hearing today …..

by von It seems that Michael Cera has finally agreed to do an Arrested Development movie.  The comment thread at the Onion's AV Club is worth reading just to relive some of the classic lines from the show, like "I'm afraid I shot the wad on the dry run and now I've got a bit … Read more

The Audacity of the Speech

by publius I’ve fumbled around tonight trying to identify the precise feeling I had about Obama’s impressive speech.  It wasn’t so much that I was stirred or excited – the times are too dour for that.  I was just deeply satisfied with it.  It made me feel very very good about the 2008 election. The … Read more

Speech Thread

by publius What do you think?  So far, it sort of sounds like he's self-consciously trying not to do Clinton's laundry list of small items.  He's going bigger.

Habeas Rights At Bagram

by hilzoy

From last Friday's NYT:

"The Obama administration has told a federal judge that military detainees in Afghanistan have no legal right to challenge their imprisonment there, embracing a key argument of former President Bush’s legal team.

In a two-sentence filing late Friday, the Justice Department said that the new administration had reviewed its position in a case brought by prisoners at the United States Air Force base at Bagram, just north of the Afghan capital. The Obama team determined that the Bush policy was correct: such prisoners cannot sue for their release. (…)

The closely watched case is a habeas corpus lawsuit on behalf of several prisoners who have been indefinitely detained for years without trial. The detainees argue that they are not enemy combatants, and they want a judge to review the evidence against them and order the military to release them.

The Bush administration had argued that federal courts have no jurisdiction to hear such a case because the prisoners are noncitizens being held in the course of military operations outside the United States. The Obama team was required to take a stand on whether those arguments were correct because a federal district judge, John D. Bates, asked the new government whether it wanted to alter that position.

The Obama administration's decision was generally expected among legal specialists. But it was a blow to human rights lawyers who have challenged the Bush administration's policy of indefinitely detaining "enemy combatants" without trials."

I am very much of two minds about this. I explain why below the fold.

Read more

Stimulus Polling

by publius A new Post/ABC poll shows strong public support for the stimulus plan, and for Obama more generally.  The same poll also shows that Democrats are retaining large advantages over congressional Republicans. It's easy to look at these numbers and think, "Wow, the GOP blew it on the stimulus.  The public doesn't support them."  … Read more

She Walks these Hills, in a Long Black Veil

by Eric Martin Some more ungrateful Iraqis that – like the Democrats – won't admit that the Surge worked and we won in Iraq: Her twin sisters were killed trying to flee Falluja in 2004. Then her husband was killed by a car bomb in Baghdad just after she had become pregnant. When her own twins … Read more

Space Oddities

by Eric Martin Dehumanization of the enemy has been inextricably linked to war since at least the onset of recorded history – and likely times precedent.  It aids in overcoming some of the psychological obstacles that complicate the process of motivating one group of humans to slaughter another without suffering crippling levels of guilt and other complicating … Read more

The Ideology of Stimulus Refusal

by publius A classic debate over the years has been whether materialism or ideology provides a more accurate explanation of historical events.  For instance, was the Cold War about imperialist conquest for resources?  Or did the revolutionary ideology of both the US and Soviet Union play a more important role in describing events?  Did the … Read more

Repeal the 17th Amendment?

by publius If I were the snarking type, I might respond to George Will’s latest by saying something like “Shorter George Will – directly electing Senators harms America.”  But that’s not my style, so I’ll try to address the merits. In criticizing Feingold’s proposed amendment to require special elections for Senate vacancies, Will argues that … Read more