by publius
Dear lord am I tired of reading columns like this. From today’s Post:
Democrats today have a problem with democracy. We have lost our voice on the issue of promoting democracy abroad — which means that what was once a core Democratic foreign policy idea is being ceded to the GOP.
. . .
Woodrow Wilson, FDR, Harry S. Truman and John F. Kennedy must be turning in their graves. Using U.S. power to promote freedom and democracy was central to their foreign policies and legacies. . . . Is the party of Wilson abandoning Wilsonianism?
Let’s hope so.
In all seriousness, I used to be very sympathetic with this foreign policy vision. But no more. I’m tired of hearing about Woodrow Wilson’s idealism, and I’m really tired of hearing about Harry Truman. Frankly, Democrats — and America more generally — would be better off abandoning idealistic democracy promotion as a foreign policy goal altogether. That’s not so much because the abstract idea is bad, it’s that attempting to implement it causes more harm than good in the real world.
As for the column itself, its first problem is that it dignifies the Bush administration’s foreign policy by pretending that it (1) is coherent and (2) embodies moral ideals. Putting aside morality, if you look at the administration’s actions (not its words), it’s difficult to conclude that democracy promotion has been a consistent priority. I can’t really complain about that though. The fact that the Bush administration has only selectively pushed for “democracy promotion” is its saving grace. Indeed, the administration’s greatest failures have come when it has tried to promote democracy (e.g., Iraq/Palestine) and/or has taken militant stances in the name of abstract ideals (Axis of Evil).
Getting away from Bush, the bigger problem with this column is on the merits. The working assumption — one expressed ad nauseum by Democratic foreign policy elites like the author — is that democracy promotion should be a central and explicit foreign policy goal. I used to agree. I don’t anymore. I’m all for human rights. I’m all for promoting liberal reforms. But I’m through with democracy promotion.
At the outset, I should say that I support democratic capitalism as much as the next guy. I wish the whole world consisted of liberal democracies — it would be a far better place. But, we conduct foreign policy with the world we have. And as recent history teaches us, the steps taken to promote democracy often make the world worse than it otherwise would be.