Porter Goss Resigns

by hilzoy

So there I was, on the highway in my little Prius, which is getting 55 mpg now that it’s getting to be summer, when all of a sudden I hear that Porter Goss has resigned. The reporter on NPR can’t imagine why; certainly, the clips they play from Bush’s announcement don’t sound as though Bush had edged him out the way he did, say, Colin Powell. The NPR reporter speculates that perhaps, since Bush mentioned how much time Goss has spent in the Oval Office, Goss might think he hasn’t had enough face time with the President. He is clearly baffled. I, on the other hand, can think of several possible reasons, thanks to the voracious newspaper and blog reading that comes with being a blogger. (h/t to TPM Muckraker and Laura Rozen for most of what follows.)

Read more

Fun With Graphs!

by hilzoy The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities has published its analysis of the new Social Security Trustees’ Report. Mostly it just explains the various changes in the Trustees’ assumptions. If you’re into these sorts of wonky details, it’s good; if not, don’t bother. It did have one graph that seemed to me worth … Read more

Andrea Clark And Medical Futility

by hilzoy

In a comment on an earlier thread, DaveC asked me to comment on the case of Andrea Clark, a Texas woman whose hospital had planned to discontinue life-support treatment. Yesterday, the hospital decided to continue treating her. But that doesn’t make the underlying issues go away, and since this is neither the first nor (in all likelihood) the last such case, I’ll discuss them below the fold. But it’s important to recognize one crucial point about cases like Andrea Clark’s: They are not about whether or not a hospital can decide to kill people. In this country, no hospital can do that legally. They are about whether a hospital should be required to go on providing care that it believes is futile.

Read more

Shelby Steele Has Entered The Twilight Zone

by hilzoy

Via Glenn Greenwald, an absolutely surreal op-ed by Shelby Steele, in which he argues that “since Vietnam, America has increasingly practiced a policy of minimalism and restraint in war”, that this restraint is why we can’t seem to defeat the insurgency in Iraq, and that the reason we practice it is … white guilt!

“Today, the white West–like Germany after the Nazi defeat–lives in a kind of secular penitence in which the slightest echo of past sins brings down withering condemnation. There is now a cloud over white skin where there once was unquestioned authority.

I call this white guilt not because it is a guilt of conscience but because people stigmatized with moral crimes–here racism and imperialism–lack moral authority and so act guiltily whether they feel guilt or not.

They struggle, above all else, to dissociate themselves from the past sins they are stigmatized with. When they behave in ways that invoke the memory of those sins, they must labor to prove that they have not relapsed into their group’s former sinfulness. So when America–the greatest embodiment of Western power–goes to war in Third World Iraq, it must also labor to dissociate that action from the great Western sin of imperialism. Thus, in Iraq we are in two wars, one against an insurgency and another against the past–two fronts, two victories to win, one military, the other a victory of dissociation. (…)

White guilt makes our Third World enemies into colored victims, people whose problems–even the tyrannies they live under–were created by the historical disruptions and injustices of the white West. We must “understand” and pity our enemy even as we fight him. And, though Islamic extremism is one of the most pernicious forms of evil opportunism that has ever existed, we have felt compelled to fight it with an almost managerial minimalism that shows us to be beyond the passions of war–and thus well dissociated from the avariciousness of the white supremacist past. (…)

Possibly white guilt’s worst effect is that it does not permit whites–and nonwhites–to appreciate something extraordinary: the fact that whites in America, and even elsewhere in the West, have achieved a truly remarkable moral transformation. One is forbidden to speak thus, but it is simply true. There are no serious advocates of white supremacy in America today, because whites see this idea as morally repugnant. If there is still the odd white bigot out there surviving past his time, there are millions of whites who only feel goodwill toward minorities.

This is a fact that must be integrated into our public life–absorbed as new history–so that America can once again feel the moral authority to seriously tackle its most profound problems. Then, if we decide to go to war, it can be with enough ferocity to win.”

Gosh: where to begin?

Read more

George W. Bush: Serious About WMD (Not!)

by hilzoy MSNBC’s Dave Schuster is now confirming a report first published by Raw Story last February: that when Valerie Wilson was outed by Karl Rove and Scooter Libby, she was working on Iranian WMD. Crooks and Liars has the video; the transcript is here. From Schuster’s report: “Intelligence sources say Valerie Wilson was part … Read more

So Much For The Rule Of Law…

by hilzoy Via Glenn Greenwald: The Boston Globe ran an excellent story yesterday on Bush’s use of signing statements to express his intention not to obey the law: “President Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside … Read more

George W. Bush: Tough On Terror (Not!)

by hilzoy For sheer ugliness, it’s hard to beat George W. Bush’s mockery of Karla Faye Tucker, who was on death row in Texas: ” In the week before [Karla Faye Tucker’s] execution, Bush says, Bianca Jagger and a number of other protesters came to Austin to demand clemency for Tucker. “Did you meet with … Read more