Culture and the War

One of the key stereotypes about Republicans and Democrats is that modern Republicans put too much trust in the military and modern Democrats too little. Despite my dislike for Kerry, I am one for nuance. I think that a truer statement would be that Republicans emphasize the benefits of military action while sometimes downplaying the … Read more

The Putin Doctrine?

Has Pandora’s Box been opened? Col.-Gen. Yuri Baluyevsky, chief of the Russian General Staff, reasserted Russia’s right to strike terrorists anywhere in the world. “As for carrying out preventive strikes against terrorist bases, we will take all measures to liquidate terrorist bases in any region of the world,” Baluyevsky told reporters. Baluyevsky made his comments … Read more

The Depth of Anger and Disappointment

The Log Cabin Republicans have voted not to endorse President Bush for re-election in 2004. Despite endorsing Dole in ’96 and Bush in 2000, they are withholding their endorsement this time. From their press release: Certain moments in history require that a belief in fairness and equality not be sacrificed in the name of partisan … Read more

Bush Getting Increasingly Wobbly on Terror

For all the staged chestbeating and applause for the steady leadership we heard at the RNC (and now Cheney is doing his best boogeyman impersonation, trying to scare the heartland with tales of how the Kerry Presidency will assuredly mean more attacks here at home [how does he know…hmm???]), this administration is sure taking some … Read more

Why I will Not Vote For Bush #2b: Afghanistan

For as long as I can remember, Afghanistan has been, in one way or another, a failed state: one of those countries whose government is hateful to its own people, in dubious and intermittent control of its territory, and as a result liable to attract all sorts of really unpleasant people who plague not just the Afghans, but everyone else as well. Every so often, when I am thinking about one of these countries, I feel like throwing up my hands and saying: why don’t we just go in and fix it? Normally we can’t, since normally one is not supposed to go around invading other countries without some very compelling reason: having been attacked, facing a clear and imminent threat which can be met by no other means, stopping an ongoing humanitarian disaster.

However, if by some total misfortune one of these conditions is met, we can legitimately invade such a country. And then we have it in our power to transform it from an ongoing disaster into a normal country. A chance like this comes along only very rarely, and it should not, in my opinion, be squandered without some very good reason to do so. For countries like Afghanistan, Somalia, and the like are, as I said, a plague both to their own people and to those around them; a persistent source of significant problems that there is, normally, no good way to set right. When the opportunity to solve these problems once and for all comes our way, we would be fools to pass it up. This is all the more true in the case of Afghanistan, since in this case a second very rare condition existed: there was someone to run the country who both was decent and had popular legitimacy. (I am not saying that Karzai is perfect; just that it is very rare, under the circumstances, for there to be someone who is non-disastrous, and that this, too, was an opportunity that should not have been squandered.)

Read more

Happy Arrival Day

And let’s have many more future celebrations of that fine day in 1654 when Jewish folks first arrived in America. Mazel tov! (Via Drezner and Eszter at Crooked Timber.)

Thorley Winston Placeholder Thread

Yes, I do intend to post on (and condemn) the widening attacks on Bush’s National Guard service during the Vietnam War. Indeed, I can think of few things less important to the nation right now than this continued harping on a war that’s thirty years old. After all, your chance of being attacked in your … Read more

Making Sense of Beslan

The events in Beslan have haunted me (as I’m sure they have most of us). As typical for me, though, I can’t seem to get enough information about how, in this day and age, it got to this…how humans (or what must at one time have been humans) could sink into the monsterous mentality that leads them to this sort of horror. David Brooks offers a customarily ill-considered take on this—it can be summarized as “It’s time to get serious about hating them back folks,” but that doesn’t strike me as a task worthy of our best minds, so I’ll leave it to him.

Here’s some of what I’ve been able to learn in my quest for useful information. It’s anything but black-and-white:

Shamil Bassajev is widely suspected of masterminding this attack:

The one-legged, black-bearded Bassajev, by now referred to as “Terrorist Number One” in the language of the Russian intelligence service, serves as an example of the mistakes and confusion that characterize the relationship between the Russian state and Chechen rebels.

Bassajev, trained by Russian military intelligence, of all things, disappeared, allegedly after having lost eleven relatives during the war with Moscow, and developed into the most-feared “Bojevik,” or rebel leader, in Chechnya.

Bassajev has a list of similar attacks credited to him, including “a bloody hostage crisis in which 1100 people were taken hostage at the district hospital in Budjonovsk in 1995” that looks very much like this most recent attack.

My partner, who grew up in the Soviet Union, tells me Chechnyans* hold a place in the Russian consciousness similar to that the Sicilians used to in ours. They are considered the most ruthless of organized criminals, the worst of the worst, scaring even other Russian mafia bosses into submission. About 10 years ago, he believes, this was the muscle behind the separatist movement in Chechnya…a turf battle by criminals to wrestle the region’s resources away from Moscow. (The separatists claim Russia wants to control the Caucasus oilfields and pipeline routes, seemingly unaware that this rationale answers the same question to at least some degree of why they were spurred to fight so desperately and unpreparedly for independence.)

Read more

(UPDATED) Two Questions.

UPDATE: In light of Ms. Malkin’s updates (here and here) of today, two questions. Both have been asked before, and both go to the heart of Ms. Malkin’s claims; yet, to my knowledge, Ms. Malkin has failed to squarely address either.

1. If the Japanese posed only a threat of “hit-and-run raids … in the first months of” World War II, and, as Ms. Malkin must concede, Germany posed an equal (and likely greater) risk of hit-and-run raids not merely in the first months but rather throughout the first years of World War II, why were Japanese-Americans* interned on the West Coast but German-Americans not interned on the East Coast?

2. If the answer to Question #1 is, as Ms. Malkin writes,

The disparate treatment of ethnic Japanese versus ethnic Germans and ethnic Italians is often assumed to be based on anti-Japanese racism rather than military necessity. Japan, however, was the only Axis country with a proven capability of launching a major attack on the United States.

“In Defense of Internment,” p. 84 (emphasis mine), what distinguishes the threat posed by Japanese-Americans of 1941 from the threat posed by Arab-Americans of 2001? What distinguishes the case for Japanese internment from a present day case for Arab internment? Merely saying that you do not advocate Arab internment is not enough; tell us why.

A direct response on both points, from Ms. Malkin or her defenders, would be appreciated.

Finally, please take note that one can favor some form of profiling against present-day terrors, without favoring or defending the internment of the Japanese during World War II. (Further to this point, the Weisenthal Center’s Op-Ed is actually a major slam of Ms. Malkins’ work (“But [Malkin] is wrong in justifying the World War II internment of Japanese Americans as a model for how we should deal today with an alleged “fifth column” among Arabs and Muslim Americans.”); I have no idea why Ms. Malkin cites it as though it supports her.)

von

*I use the term “Japanese-Americans” to indicate those persons of Japanese descent who had been born in the United States and who had not spent significant time in Japan.

UPDATE TWO: In a subsequent post, Malkin asks “What are they so afraid of?” (referring to teachers and principals who have refused to change their lesson plans to account for Malkin’s revisions). Fear has nothing to do with it; as I understand their decision, they believe that Malkin’s work does not meet their minimum academic standards. Schools are not required to teach crap.

Geez, this used to be a lesson that the Left had trouble with — all views are equal, every perspective deserves equal respect, yada yada yada. Now I find the same silliness on the uber-Right. If Malkin wants to be taken seriously by serious people, she’s got to defend her thesis against attack over the course of years, and convince the experts in the field that her thesis is the best one. Only then can we start talking about changing lesson plans.

______
Original Post Follows
______

Read more

Why I will Not Vote For Bush #2a: The War on Terror

The second reason why I will not vote for George Bush is his handling of the war on terror. I supported basically everything Bush did in this area between 9/11 and sometime around the end of 2001. Since that time, I don’t think he has done well at all. This post is a sort of preface to several subsequent posts on specific aspects of the war on terror.

Read more

Rasmussen’s Robots Reset?

(Crossposted to Redstate) Polls and me… well, I never much trusted them to begin with, and after the way they failed to map the 2002 Congressional elections I decided to simply ignore any of them that tried to project more than 72 hours in the future. Except for Rasmussen’s daily poll, of course. I dunno … Read more

New additions to Von’s blogroll

Eric Muller of “Is That Legal?” Stan of “Logic & Sanity.” Lawrence Lessig. Oh, and I’d like to formally sign on to the following e-mail to Todd Zywicki at the Volokh Conspiracy: “At this point I swear I will pay solid money in small bills to make the wine wars stop. Signed, A Fan“ Yes. … Read more

The Wrong Approach

I just caught Richard Gephardt on Fox News Sunday: In response to virtually every question, Gephardt brought up Kerry’s experience in Vietnam and said that the electorate wants “a change in direction” — and not much else. Memo to Gephardt (and the Kerry campaign): We all know about Kerry’s Vietnam experiences.* If Kerry’s going to win (and it’s starting to look unlikely), he’s got to start talking about the future. He’s gotta tell us what he will do once elected. [There’s more.]

Read more

Huh. How much money are we talking about, here?

…what? Oh. The Truth Laid Bear has noted that we’re within 60 days of the election, which means that a lot of 527s can’t spend money on radio and TV ads anymore – but the Internet’s explicitly exempt from that, and there’s certainly still money to burn. I’ve never been one for wanting to offer … Read more

I couldn’t either, Gene.

I don’t know if you folks read the WaPo’s Below the Beltway; I may have to start making it a regular peruse, if it’s got stuff like this (link probably required: I’m already registered, and, besides, Mozilla and BugMeNot have an understanding):

[Editor’s note: Mr Weingarten apparently enjoys calling up 1-800 customer complaint lines and asking bizarre questions. Let’s watch.]

Read more

What?

UPDATE TWO: Professor Reynolds has updated and clarified the post discussed below. Please keep Reynolds’s update in mind as you read the following, which was drafted before the update. (My personal view of Reynolds’s update is, “well done.”) Yglesias has also updated; please read it as well. [Ad hominem attack by yours truly on a … Read more

How Can This Be Right?

From the New York Times: “Members of the military will be allowed to vote this year by faxing or e-mailing their ballots – after waiving their right to a secret ballot. Beyond this fundamentally undemocratic requirement, the Electronic Transmission Service, as it’s known, has far too many problems to make it reliable, starting with the … Read more

Idiot Tries to Clone the Dead

And now for something completely different (from the BBC): “US fertility doctor Panos Zavos says he has created a cloned embryo using tissue from dead people. Dr Zavos told a press conference in London he had successfully combined genetic material from three dead people with cow eggs to make embryos that were an identical copy … Read more

Holiday Open Thread

There’s no telling who’ll be around to post, so I offer up this holiday open thread. Keep it light — between botched Russian rescues, Clinton in surgery, Zell on Earth,* and insinuations regarding Dick Cheney’s and Kerry’s patriotism(s), there are plenty of other threads to vent. As for me: Well, I’ve had two favorable settlements … Read more

Unspeakable Horror

Warning: very disturbing graphic images at first link: The photos coming out of Russia are impossible to describe. 100 are reportedly dead. As von noted below, Stan of Logic & Sanity is providing the most phenomenal coverage of this unspeakable violation of human decency. I had to post this, but I can’t bring myself to … Read more

Critique of RNC Reason

[Moe, or anyone else a bit tired of political threads, might want to skip this one. Thank God the election’s nearly here :-)]

In his devastating tome, Critique of Cynical Reason, Peter Sloterdijk lays out his case that the inescapable condition of our time is a state of “enlightened false consciousness.” In a nutshell, he argues that thanks to enlightenment (and the furious deconstruction of our literature, philosophy, social science, etc., that occupied our thinkers up through the middle decades of the 20th Century) we feel we have a pretty good sense of how things work…that we can see through the rhetoric…but individually we’re powerless to do anything about objectionable things we hear and see. So, as a whole, we just go along with them. The reality of our physical lives (needing a house, food, transportation, etc.) trumps the hopes/insights of our intellectual lives, and so, well-off and miserable at the same time, we become immune to any critique of ideology. We choose to just chug along knowing half of what we hear is B.S. What else can we do? There are bills to pay.

This all came flooding back to me while watching the response to the First Lady’s speech at the Republican National Convention. I don’t mean to single her out…her speech was fine, but it was riddled with what seemed the sorts of delusions that would have easily induced bellylaughs or snorted gaffaws in an audience just 40 years ago. My own personal response now? “Yeah, well, she loves her husband.”

Again, I don’t mean to single Mrs. Bush out; here’s a selection of statements offered during the Republican National Convention that demand an enlightened false consciousness if one is not to shout “What are you smoking?” at the speaker. Why the delegates didn’t, well, I hope Sloterdijk covers it…the alternative is so much worse:

Read more

Big Swingin’ Governments

President Bush’s speech last night was about the future — and, in general, it was well presented. Bush did not fall into le trap de Kerry, as I feared he might. But I was utterly amazed by the kind of future that Bush presented. Not a future of small government, but a future of expanded … Read more

For the record.

It’s been obvious for the past few days that I am exceptionally grouchy right now, not to say short-tempered; sometimes even rude. What is going on is that I am currently trying to decide whether I actually still enjoy blogging; there is quite a bit of blogger fatigue going on out there right now, and … Read more

First reactions.

I thought the speech was generally good, although he stumbled over words in places (smart of him to joke about it, though, and that bit about a certain swagger that in TX they call ‘walking’ was easily the funniest line of the speech). I winced at the stuff about gay marriage – it’s where I … Read more

The Hottest Place in Hell

I’ve been thinking lately about the advantage Bush’s ease with folksy speak gives him in this race. Even watching Brooks and Shields on PBS, it’s clearly easier to like the more relaxed Brooks (despite his opinions) than the more uptight Shields. We like likable people. Folksy demeanors help them look more relaxed and hence more … Read more

Convention thoughts — Miller and Cheney

What remains most striking to me about these speeches — more than the evident bile, the personal issues being worked out in public, and silly attacks on the patriotism of others (rising, in Zell’s case, almost to the level of self-satire) — is the seeming obliviousness on Iraq. You wouldn’t know it from these speechs, … Read more

Miller Speech

I don’t normally watch political speechs live, and at each convention it appears that I watch the worst–which certainly isn’t positive reinforcement to change my ways. Yesterday I watched Miller’s speech. I agree with Andrew Sullivan that Miller is too angry and at the wrong people. He appears to confuse opponents with enemies: No one … Read more

Russia News

Stan of Logic & Sanity has comprehensive coverage of the terrorist attacks on a Russia school. (Stan speaks Russian, and has been translating some of the local news reports.) Via Citizen Smash, who has returned from his adventures in blog-hosting and is “reporting for duty.” So to speak.

The System of Laws

I’ve been engaged in quite a few discussions about various facets of the legal system lately. Since ideas make better sense within a context, I think it would be a good idea to discuss my understanding of how the general system of creating laws works (or maybe ought to work) in the United States. I … Read more

Learn from the Master…

…because this is how you tease Republicans: cheerfully, quickly and with a ready sense of everybody’s absurdity (not just the Other Side’s) firmly in mind*. Sweet Merciful Jeebus and his brother Harry, how I wish that whatever it is that Fafnir has were contagious. (Via Constant Reader James Casey, who needs to start blogging again) … Read more