Retired Military Officers Express “Deep Concern” About Gonzales Nomination

From the Washington Post:

“A dozen high-ranking retired military officers took the unusual step yesterday of signing a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee expressing “deep concern” over the nomination of White House counsel Alberto R. Gonzales as attorney general, marking a rare military foray into the debate over a civilian post.

The group includes retired Army Gen. John M. Shalikashvili, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The officers are one of several groups to separately urge the Senate to sharply question Gonzales during a confirmation hearing Thursday about his role in shaping legal policies on torture and interrogation methods.”

Read more

My Take on Talk Radio: Part I

I have a job that puts me in the car several times a week. The radio is usually on and it’s frequently tuned in to talk radio. How did I get started? Back in the late 1980s, after several hours out in the field and getting bored with music stations, I switched over to the AM band and heard Rush Limbaugh for the first time. Quite frankly, I was hooked because outside the Wall Street Journal and a few low-circulation magazines, there was no real outlet that represented and articulated my conservative views. The alternative was to fume at the obvious bias of CNN and network news coverage. Judging by the growth of Rush’s listenership and the number of subsequent offshoots, I wasn’t the only one was frustrated with TV news.  So began my journey as a talk radio listener.

Read more

Freaky Phobia Monday: Open Thread

OK, in an effort to lighten the mood around here, I’m posting an open thread on nonpolitical phobias. What do you irrationally fear? I know I should not admit this in a public forum, but I have a near paralyzing fear of whales. There. I’ve admitted it. Whales scare the bejesus out of me.

I think I always knew this, but never having encountered a whale, it didn’t become clear until I watched the Japanese film Dr. Akagi. There’s a scene where a man and woman row out into the sea in a tiny row boat and there’s this amazing aerial shot of a massive whale swimming right below them, dwarfing them. I nearly had a seizure, and even now, just visualizing it makes me shiver.

My friends find this highly amusing. After all, whales get really good press overall. There’s "Free Willy" and "Save the Whales" and Shamu…but I’m telling you, it’s just not right. Nothing should be that much larger than I am.

There’s a scene in 20000 Leagues Beneath the Sea where Captain Nemo opens the portal covering in his submarine and you can look out into the deep abyss. As a kid watching that film, I nearly freaked out during that scene. I used to think it was the wide open space I was afraid of, but now I believe it was simply a sense that "that’s enough room for a whale to come along in."

This will prevent me from ever taking up scuba diving seriously. Even now when snorkeling, as I love to do, if the distance between the ocean floor and the top of the water becomes, er…well, whale size, I have to turn back. I just know that if I stay, merrily enjoying the adorable (i.e., smaller than me) marine life around me, I’ll bump into this wall that I swore wasn’t there a moment ago, and just as I being to explore the barnacles and bumps on its surface, the really large one will open to reveal a giant eyeball as big as my whole head and I will die right there, on the spot. I can’t explain it.

Feel free to scoff…but only if you offer your own phobias first.

Read more

Credit Where It’s Due

Now this is the sort of gesture that makes me proud to be an American: President Bush has tapped former Presidents Clinton and Bush to lead a nationwide charitable fund-raising effort for victims of the Asian tsunamis, the White House announced Monday. The two men will lead an effort "to encourage the American people and … Read more

Bob Matsui Dead at 63

We all take what we want from a man’s or woman’s passing.  Some cherish the old agreements (thank you for your brave stand for NAFTA); others respectfully note the disagreements (but I could’ve done without the pre-emptive opposition to Social Security reform).  Still others take the simplier route — that the person was a good … Read more

Posting Rules Reprise

I haven’t talked to my co-bloggers about this, but I’m taking this opportunity to repost the posting rules.  If I say something out of line, I’m sure they will set me straight.  In other words, to quote the Vigilantes of Love, "I could be wrong, I could be wrong, but I really don’t think so." 

We have had about four examples of threads which have degenerated into hellish examples of ugliness while us regular posters have been on vacation. 

Quit it.

I will be the very first to admit that I have, on occasion, responded inappropriately to people.  I’m not as good at setting the tone as Moe was.  But people… please try to respond to ideas.  Please try to explain ideas.  Please try to come up with ideas.  Please try to think things through.  Please respond to people who disagree with you without becoming monsters.  I think we have an excellent site here, and it is one of the few places where people have been able to come from different sides to talk about lots of different things.  The blogosphere doesn’t need dKos III, FreeRepublic IV, LGF V, or heaven help us WashingtonMonthly II. 

So I’m reposting the posting rules.  But as we know from the discussion of law around here, the letter of the law doesn’t always cut it.  Fortunately we are all adults here, (or if you aren’t we are going to give you the courtesy of treating you as one) so think about the spirit of the rules–pointed discusssion without vilification.  So without further discussion, the posting rules…

Be reasonably civil.

No profanity. For the record, ‘hell’, ‘damn’ and ‘pissed’ are not considered ‘profanity’ for the purposes of this rule; also for the record, the more offensive racial slurs and epithets will be deemed to ‘profanity’ for the purposes of this rule

Don’t disrupt or destroy meaningful conversation for its own sake.

Do not consistently abuse or vilify other posters for its own sake.

Like Tac, we don’t ban for ideological reasons (unless you’re a Nazi or something equally vile) and/or simple disagreements (never mind that it’s not the easiest thing in the world to find someone who can manage to disagree with Katherine, von and me on the same topic). We’re all adults here, so I’m sure that this should be sufficient – with one caveat: there are a couple of notable trolls out there who will be banned the moment that they show up. As of 1:18 PM EST, Sunday, November 30, 2003, they haven’t, so if you’ve made a post here before then I’m not talking about you.

Lastly, just a reminder that Left and Right have very broad definitions and that people are going to take it personally if you inform them that of course all Xs eat babies, should they themselves be Xs (or Ys trying to keep things cool).

UPDATE (05/19/2004): As you may have noticed, we delete and ban spambots on sight. This is because comments sections are for original and/or interesting thoughts, not mass postings. Therefore, please note that if I come across a overly-long comment that is obviously a cut n’paste job, out it goes, no apologies, no regrets. Small cut n’pastes are fine; entire articles are not: when in doubt, it’s too long. Mind, if you have seen or made a comment elsewhere that would be perfect for a particular thread, you are more than welcome to link to it; just don’t give us the entire thing. We don’t have unlimited storage space.

ANOTHER UPDATE (10/24/2004): Calls for the assassination of any politician will be subject to immediate banning. An exception is made for legitimate military targets in time of war; due to the unique nature of the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, members of the Palestinian Authority are to be considered ‘politicians’ for the purpose of this rule.

The above should be explicitly not read as being a prohibition on (but is not limited to) criticism, vituperation, espousal of conspiracy theories, disagreement, speculation on personal habits and/or motivations, expressions of contempt, unfavorable extrapolations of past behavior in order to guess future behavior, mild cursing or any other traditional method of expressing disapproval with a politician’s policy positions or personality, provided of course that such behavior does not violate another of the Posting Rules.

Read more

Regarding Saudi Arabia

I think it is quite clear that Saudi Arabia is a big part of the problem in the spread of the dangerous side of fundamentalist Islam.  I submit that there are two major problems in dealing with them, one economic and the other cultural.  First, they have a lot of oil which we want them … Read more

Getting Gonzales Ready for His Close-up

Late Thursday night, with no public announcement, the Justice Department updated its defintion of "torture" on its website. In a memorandum (pdf file) written by Daniel Levin (acting assistant attorney general in charge of the Office of Legal Counsel), the DOJ essentially now takes it all back. Specifically, this new memorandum rejects the earlier assertion … Read more