Two Heroes

By Edward

I realize there are those in certain quarters who will cry "what took so long?" as if there were no cultural, practical, or personal (including personal safety) obstacles, but two moderate Muslims are now clearly leading the way toward a brighter future for the followers of Islam who live in the West.

The first has been at it a while actually (and I don’t mind pointing out to those who feel homosexuals harm rather than help society, that it took a lesbian to find the courage to stand up the world and say what’s right here). Irshad Manji (whose book The Trouble with Islam Today sits on my nightstand for quick reference) voiced an opinion that I’ve long held regarding foreign-born Muslims who preach hate in adopted Western countries: they should be deported swiftly:

For a European leader, Prime Minister Tony Blair of Britain has done something daring. He has given notice not just to the theocrats of Islam, but also to the theocracy of tolerance.

"Staying here carries with it a duty," Mr. Blair said in referring to foreign-born Muslim clerics who glorify terror on British soil. "That duty is to share and support the values that sustain the British way of life. Those who break that duty and try to incite hatred or engage in violence against our country and its people have no place here."

With that, his government proposed new laws to deport extremist religious leaders, to shut down the mosques that house them and to ban groups with a history of supporting terrorism. The reaction was swift: a prominent human rights advocate described Mr. Blair’s measures as "neo-McCarthyite hectoring," warning that they would make the British "less distinguishable from the violent, hateful and unforgiving theocrats, our democracy undermined from within in ways that the suicide bombers could only have dreamed of."

Of course, there’s the danger that some folks will misconstrue what Blair said, and Manji applauds, and conclude "tolerance" in and of itself is a bad thing, so it bears pointing out that they’re clearly limiting their statements to a tolerance for for tolerance’s sake that forgives violence here. Any citizen of any nation can work, within the system, for change, but no one has the right to intentionally harm others in that quest. I’ve noted frequently (and long before the July 7th bombing) that the laws that permitted hate-mongering foreign-born Imams to remain in England were foolish. You don’t have to love it or leave it, but you damn well better let it live in peace or leave it. Muslims are obligated, like everyone else, to protect their nation, whether immigrants or born there.

My second hero is new to me, but precisely what the UK needs. Meet Shahid Malik:

Read more

Is My Child Becoming Homosexual?

By Edward You’ve probably seen this on Fafblog already, but just in case, be sure not to miss these helpful hints for determining whether your pre-pubescent son is turning queer before your very eyes, compliments of Dr. Dobson and those thoughtful folks at Focus on the Family. Do any of these behaviors describe your 5 … Read more

US Muslims Make it Clear

by Edward we interrupt our self-imposed hiatus to bring you the following rant: Despite the likes of the so-called comedian Michael Graham, who still refuses to apologize for calling Islam a “terrorist organization” on his radio show, US Muslims are responding to the growing tension since the attacks in London with restraint, maturity, and a … Read more

Give Truth a Chance

by Edward John Kerry, in a New York Times op-ed piece titled "The Speech the President Should Give," really doesn’t offer anything of the kind. Instead he runs through, once more, the laundry list of complaints against the way the Iraq invasion’s been handled. Oh, he suggests here and there a variance to the current … Read more

Art and the End of China’s Cultural Revolution

You have no idea how happy this makes me: Not so long ago Chinese authorities were in the business of closing down contemporary exhibitions. Curators and artists organised shows furtively: at the 2000 Shanghai Biennial, for example, the official State-subsidised exhibition was accompanied by a crop of impromptu “underground” shows in warehouses and basements, most … Read more

Who is Tamika Huston?

By Edward

Via Drum
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Who is Tamika Huston? She’s what’s been dubbed a "Damsel in Distress" or DiD by MSM critics lately. A young attractive woman who’s missing, and whose family is appealing to the media for help in finding her. Hilzoy pointed to this excellent satire on the phenomenon by the Poor Man (but that site is experiencing heavy traffic, so you might have trouble getting through).

Unlike the runaway bride Jennifer Wilbanks, Laci Peterson, Elizabeth Smart, or Natalee Holloway (missing in Aruba), though, Tamika, who’s been missing over a year, did not get her beautiful face plastered all over the airwaves and tabloids. Compared to those other women, she’s barely gotten any attention at all.

Here’s a photo of Tamika:

Read more

Stigma and Hunger

by Edward

Today seems to be a day for painful confessions, so I’ll share one of mine. My first two years of high school (before I was old enough to get a job and make money of my own), my father was struggling financially (the steel mill was perpetually laying people off, he had a chunk of debt, and he was paying alimony). Because of our status, the city allowed my brothers and sisters and I to buy a subsidized lunch at school. For 25 cents we could get the same standard lunch other children paid a few dollars for, but we would have to stand in a special (highly visible) line with all the other children whose parents were struggling.

I’m nothing if not a stubbornly proud s.o.b. I took the quarter my father gave me each morning and bought my lunch in the same line and vending machines my friends did. That bought me a small milk and pack of Oreo cookies (things were cheaper back then). And that’s what I ate for lunch for over two years. I didn’t realize it at the time, but somehow the experience translated into an overall aversion to food. For me, food equaled shame.

There’s a photo of me in swim trunks in my sophomore year yearbook. I’m so frightfully emaciated in that photo, to this day I can’t stand to look at it. Imagine photos of children from famine-stricken countries, and you’ll be very close to how I looked. Someone on the yearbook staff cut it out and posted it on the bulletin board of the offices with a little speech bubble above my head reading "Feed me." I don’t recall being hungry back then (I’m still quite thin and have a fast metabolism, although love handles are settling in now), but clearly I was malnourished.

This is a long-about POV-providing introduction into this post:

Read more

When Is It Right to Remove a President from Office?

Oddly, it would seem that’s not a rhetorical question. I mean, according to the Constitution, The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. That seems pretty straightforward: the president should be removed … Read more

Why Are Conservatives People Afraid of Books?

UPDATE: Slartibartfast, who I have a great deal of respect for, was offended by this column (apparently missing the smiley face at the end of it). I don’t think it’s appropriate to edit the text, but I will concede, as others have pointed out, that liberals have been known to call for books to be … Read more

Dick and AI

Can you stomach a bit more on the AI report? No? You’ll want to skip this one then. In what is undoubtedly an "enter at your own risk" sort of post (seriously, not work friendly at all), The Rude Pundit (h/t wilfred) demolishes Larry King’s "interview" of Vice-President Dick Cheney. Among the safer comments to … Read more