by Doctor Science
At this point, all Democrats and a sprinkling of Republicans call the House GOP’s threat to not raise the debt ceiling “hostage-taking” or indeed “economic terrorism”. When Obama absolutely refuses to negotiate about the debt ceiling, then, we think “that’s right, we don’t negotiate with terrorists” and nod firmly.
Breaching the debt ceiling would mean defaulting on the US’s obligations. It’s not about refusing to run up more debt, it’s about refusing to pay debts we’re already run up. The results would likely be catastrophic, for the US and for the rest of the world.

The Death of Samson, by
Gustave Doré. Collapsing the ceiling, no matter how righteously, may not be the best long-term planning.
Obama *did* negotiate with Republicans to avert a 2011 debt ceiling breach, but it was really ugly. He seems to have hoped that it was a one-time thing, but Republicans clearly didn’t feel that way.:
[Senator (R-KY) Mitch] McConnell said he could imagine doing this again.
“I think some of our members may have thought the default issue was a hostage you might take a chance at shooting,” he said. “Most of us didn’t think that. What we did learn is this — it’s a hostage that’s worth ransoming.”Now the Republicans have taken the same hostage, again — as could have been predicted by anyone who’d ever heard of Danegeld.
The thing is, though we may say “don’t negotiate with terrorists”, that’s complete (and dangerous) bull. If someone takes hostages, *of course* you talk with them. You negotiate because calming the situation and getting the hostages out alive is far more important than “standing firm”.
Read more